![]() |
Yikes ... those darned Texans are at it again... - Printable Version +- MacResource (https://forums.macresource.com) +-- Forum: My Category (https://forums.macresource.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=1) +--- Forum: 'Friendly' Political Ranting (https://forums.macresource.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=6) +--- Thread: Yikes ... those darned Texans are at it again... (/showthread.php?tid=112715) |
Re: Yikes ... those darned Texans are at it again... - SDGuy - 02-27-2011 I assume the push behind this is in reaction to Virginia Tech, and other similar school shootings. Even so, I'd be a bit wary of letting college students be armed on campus - but if the real impetus is to have responsible, armed individuals around, how about allowing faculty members (who have jumped through the hoops required to get a CCW permit) carry concealed? This is assuming that said faculty members are mature and responsible enough to do so safely - they certainly couldn't do any worse than some security guards I've seen... Re: Yikes ... those darned Texans are at it again... - PeterB - 02-27-2011 Pam wrote: Yes. And protect others from them. The younger generation doesn't settle arguments/disrespect the way we did. Unfortunately, Pam speaks the truth. It used to be that if you were a girl and you'd been dumped, you'd cry, get over it, and eventually move on. Now, you take your ex's photo, label with all sorts of demeaning stuff, and plaster all over the internet. http://forums.macresource.com/read.php?1,1090639,1090639#msg-1090639 It used to be that if you were a boy and you had a picture of your hot gf half-naked, you might show it to your closest guy friends to brag. Now, you take your gf's pic and text it to 200 of your closest friends, including the whole football team: http://forums.macresource.com/read.php?2,620069,620069#msg-620069 Re: Yikes ... those darned Texans are at it again... - Mac1337 - 02-27-2011 cbelt3 wrote: It was sarcasm. I guess I didn't succeed. Re: Yikes ... those darned Texans are at it again... - Uncle Wig - 02-27-2011 Consider which students would be most likely to get a gun and bring it to school. There may be a few who take it seriously and know what they're doing, but I have no doubt the most of them would be doing it just to be cool. Yeah, a dorm full of drunken, well-armed, untrained college students seems like a swell idea! :confused: Re: Yikes ... those darned Texans are at it again... - Mac1337 - 02-27-2011 Uncle Wig wrote: Same was said about concealed carry. Mad motorist engage in shoot outs in traffic jams. If you put your power of imagination into what criminals with guns would do we'd be a little safer. Re: Yikes ... those darned Texans are at it again... - RgrF - 02-28-2011 cbelt3 wrote: Just think of what it could have descended to had those unfortunate Kent State students and their (at the time) very pissed-off friends been packing. Flooding campuses with handguns, campuses that are already alcohol and drug fueled is the height of idiocy. If you want your student armed enroll him/her in a military academy. Re: Yikes ... those darned Texans are at it again... - rankandfile - 02-28-2011 I haven't made up my mind on this issue. A rigorous training course for a concealed carry permit is essential, in my view. I remember wondering how things might have been different at Va. Tech if those professors had been armed. OTOH, I can't reconcile the idea of widespread use of guns on campus. These gun statistics are from 2006: Annual Gun Homicides Finland 17 Australia 35 England and Wales 39 Spain 60 Germany 194 Canada 200 United States 9484 (plus almost 20,000 other gun-related deaths) United States Firearm Homicide Rate (Adjusted For Population) — 5 times that of Canada — 10 times that of Finland — 13 times that of Germany — 19 times that of Australia — 24 times that of Spain. — 44 times that of England and Wales http://www.bradycampaign.org/xshare/Facts/2010-09_GBA_Overview_FINAL.pdf Re: Yikes ... those darned Texans are at it again... - Lux Interior - 02-28-2011 Supporters of the legislation argue that gun violence on campuses, such as the mass shootings at Virginia Tech in 2007 and Northern Illinois in 2008, show that the best defense against a gunman is students who can shoot back. I would agree that a sane person would not go on a shooting rampage if they knew they may likely face an armed opposition. Now we can forget that argument, because sane people don't typically go on shooting rampages. They either plan to get shot by the police or eat the barrel if they get trapped. After the shootings on the VT campus, the usual arguments were given that armed students would have prevented the tragedy. My counter argument was that it would be more likely for untrained students to shoot each other. Fast-forward to the Giffords shooting in AZ. read this: http://www.slate.com/id/2280794/ So, you hear shots and you have a gun. You arrive at a scene and see someone holding a gun (a civilian). You have no experience or training. What do you do? Re: Yikes ... those darned Texans are at it again... - OWC Jamie - 02-28-2011 RgrF wrote: Just think of what it could have descended to had those unfortunate Kent State students and their (at the time) very pissed-off friends been packing. Like Terri Norman and of course some of the drug dealers that carried for protection but probably were smart enough not to hang around ? . I'd prefer all campusses were gunfree zones - at least pills can be pumped out in time sometimes. Including and especially dorms. Gun clubs can exist off-campus in most instances, and should. Re: Yikes ... those darned Texans are at it again... - rankandfile - 02-28-2011 Thanks for that link, Lux. |