+- MacResource (https://forums.macresource.com)
+-- Forum: My Category (https://forums.macresource.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: 'Friendly' Political Ranting (https://forums.macresource.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=6)
+--- Thread: Uber PAC schmoober PAC (/showthread.php?tid=131811)
Pages:
1
2
Re: Uber PAC schmoober PAC - Ted King - 02-10-2012
August West wrote:
I go with Super Pac. You know why? Because I want to, I'm a descriptive grammarian and I think viewpoints like :nono: :judge: "English Grammar has certain rules" :judge: :nono: belong to kids who had their knuckles rapped by Uber Fussy nuns in grade school! :booty:
At least a few people here probably have a prescription for that affliction.
Re: Uber PAC schmoober PAC - Lux Interior - 02-10-2012
cbelt3 wrote:
They are not.
U down due much riddin' tha innernets, does ya?
Re: Uber PAC schmoober PAC - $tevie - 02-10-2012
Most of the articles credited to the AP use super PAC.
Re: Uber PAC schmoober PAC - $tevie - 02-10-2012
cbelt3 wrote:
English Grammar has certain rules. Persons writing news articles often consider those rules to be optional.
That's not really true. There's an AP Stylebook and believe you me, people use it.