+- MacResource (https://forums.macresource.com)
+-- Forum: My Category (https://forums.macresource.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: 'Friendly' Political Ranting (https://forums.macresource.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=6)
+--- Thread: Speaking of unfortunate campaign contributions (/showthread.php?tid=131814)
Pages:
1
2
Re: Speaking of unfortunate campaign contributions - max - 02-12-2012
Grace62 wrote:
Difference?
What are you expecting Mitt Romney to do about Wall Street, other than undo the reforms put in place over the past 3 years?
What are you smoking?
Wall Street reforms?
Like the reinstitution of Glass Steagall?
Oh wait, besides some meaningless propaganda window dressing
it never happened.
There is nothing for Romney to repeal.
Or do you expect to Romney to take back from Wall Street all the money Obama dumped on them?
It does not even make a decent strawman.
Anyway, back to your OP,
do you expect Romney to force you to buy pornography?....
Re: Speaking of unfortunate campaign contributions - Grace62 - 02-12-2012
max wrote:
[quote=Grace62]
Difference?
What are you expecting Mitt Romney to do about Wall Street, other than undo the reforms put in place over the past 3 years?
Wall Street reforms?
Oh wait, besides some meaningless propaganda window dressing
it never happened.
There is nothing for Romney to repeal.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Restoring_American_Financial_Stability_Act_of_2010
Republicans hate this bill for a reason, and it's not because of ineffectiveness.
Sure Romney would love to have it repealed.
As for the pornography issue, your question is weird and not related to anything I wrote in the OP, so I won't bother.
Re: Speaking of unfortunate campaign contributions - max - 02-13-2012
Grace62 wrote:Dreaming.
Republicans hate this bill for a reason, and it's not because of ineffectiveness.
You were sold another bill of goods.
The bill had NOTHING to do with Wall Street, it was a BANKING regulatory bill. Pure smoke and mirrors.
Just more lipstick on the same pig.
What is telling that Obama and BOTH, Democrats and Republicans, will do anything, but bring back the essence of Glass Steagall, the only first step to meaningful Wall Street reform....
Grace62 wrote:Why would he, it did nothing?
Sure Romney would love to have it repealed.
Did he ever even bring it up, except as an example of Obama's incompetence?...
Grace62 wrote:
As for the pornography issue, your question is weird and not related to anything I wrote in the OP, so I won't bother.
So what was the point of your OP, sweetheart?
YOU are the one the brought up porno money going to Romney.
I do not recall Romney campaigning against pornography.
So the only conclusion is that you are fearing, having Obama experience of the effect of the his political donations, being forced to buy pornography or that pornography industry is going to be massively subsidized by our money.
Or was it that the entire OP was pointless?....
Re: Speaking of unfortunate campaign contributions - Lux Interior - 02-13-2012
max wrote:
So the only conclusion is that you are fearing, having Obama experience of the effect of the his political donations, being forced to buy pornography or that pornography industry is going to be massively subsidized by our money.
WTF am I reading?
Re: Speaking of unfortunate campaign contributions - $tevie - 02-13-2012
Lux Interior wrote:
[quote=max]
So the only conclusion is that you are fearing, having Obama experience of the effect of the his political donations, being forced to buy pornography or that pornography industry is going to be massively subsidized by our money.
WTF am I reading?
Jabberwocky.
Re: Speaking of unfortunate campaign contributions - Grace62 - 02-13-2012
$tevie wrote:
[quote=Lux Interior]
[quote=max]
So the only conclusion is that you are fearing, having Obama experience of the effect of the his political donations, being forced to buy pornography or that pornography industry is going to be massively subsidized by our money.
WTF am I reading?
Jabberwocky.
Sarah Palin is writing Max's comments now. That's the only conclusion that you are fearing, having Obama experience of the his....
Re: Speaking of unfortunate campaign contributions - August West - 02-13-2012
WTF am I reading?
Someone with a pornography obsession, it would appear.
Re: Speaking of unfortunate campaign contributions - max - 02-14-2012
August West wrote: Someone with a pornography obsession, it would appear.I agree.
Why was she bringing it up?
Grace62 wrote:
Squeaky clean, careful-to-a-fault Mormon Mitt's campaign has accepted a $2,500 contribution from the man whose company owns Penthouse, AdultFriendFinder.com, Likemygayphoto.com and Bondage.com.
That was my question.....