![]() |
iPhone 5 "inferior" because screen only covers 72% of NTSC color gamut? - Printable Version +- MacResource (https://forums.macresource.com) +-- Forum: My Category (https://forums.macresource.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=1) +--- Forum: Tips and Deals (https://forums.macresource.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=3) +--- Thread: iPhone 5 "inferior" because screen only covers 72% of NTSC color gamut? (/showthread.php?tid=142351) Pages:
1
2
|
Re: iPhone 5 "inferior" because screen only covers 72% of NTSC color gamut? - silvarios - 10-03-2012 Sam3 wrote: Then refute it. Easy to say something is incorrect, harder to provide actual evidence. I'm not necessarily in agreement, or disagreement for that matter, as I didn't read the linked piece yet. I would appreciate an actual rebuttal so I can compared and contrast sources. Re: iPhone 5 "inferior" because screen only covers 72% of NTSC color gamut? - Kramerica - 10-04-2012 deleted ...posted a link that I hadn't noticed was above.... Re: iPhone 5 "inferior" because screen only covers 72% of NTSC color gamut? - pRICE cUBE - 10-04-2012 In my non scientific observations, most people cannot tell the difference between colors, contrast, and resolution unless something comparative is right next to it. Some of those people will not care about color gamut as long as they can post images of themselves standing in front of a bathroom mirror and showing off their goods for their social media friends to say all sorts of puffery about how good they look. Meanwhile Apple laughs all the way to the bank. Re: iPhone 5 "inferior" because screen only covers 72% of NTSC color gamut? - RAMd®d - 10-04-2012 I'm curious as to the relationship of color gamut to display thickness. Neither color gamut or the Apple Maps app seem to be an impediment to 'Phone sales. Re: iPhone 5 "inferior" because screen only covers 72% of NTSC color gamut? - Speedy - 10-04-2012 Grasping much, are they? |