![]() |
Mandate to buy gun liability insurance? - Printable Version +- MacResource (https://forums.macresource.com) +-- Forum: My Category (https://forums.macresource.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=1) +--- Forum: 'Friendly' Political Ranting (https://forums.macresource.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=6) +--- Thread: Mandate to buy gun liability insurance? (/showthread.php?tid=150764) |
Re: Mandate to buy gun liability insurance? - max - 04-03-2013 Ted King wrote:While I am pro choice, I am still curious, which specific article or an amendment guarantees the right to an abortion?... Re: Mandate to buy gun liability insurance? - RgrF - 04-03-2013 Driving a car may be a privilege, owning a car is a property right. Re: Mandate to buy gun liability insurance? - rjmacs - 04-03-2013 max wrote: So mandating auto insurance is OK but firearm insurance should be verboten? You should know better, Roger, that is one reason the state clearly states AND repeats over and over, "driving is a privilege, not a right", weapon ownership happens to be specifically mentioned in Constitution... This is a specious argument. If any state attempted to outlaw driving automobiles wholesale, the statute would be struck down immediately as an unreasonable infringement on the right to assemble and likely the right to petition. Re: Mandate to buy gun liability insurance? - davester - 04-03-2013 There's nothing in the constitution that says that there is a right to own a weapon for personal purposes (sport, self-defense, etc.). I agree that there should be no burdens (monetary or otherwise) on the right of the people (not necessarily individuals) to bear arms in support of a well-regulated militia. However, the almost completely unregulated ownership of guns for all sorts of uses having nothing to do with this purpose is not a constitutional right. Why is this difficult to understand? Re: Mandate to buy gun liability insurance? - Acer - 04-03-2013 I'm told guns accidents and homicides are very rare in the U.S., so this insurance should not be very expensive., Re: Mandate to buy gun liability insurance? - rjmacs - 04-03-2013 davester wrote: As much as i tend to agree with this historical interpretation, the SCotUS has ruled otherwise. As of now, there is a constitutional individual right to own and keep a gun in one's home for self-defense. That doesn't mean they have to be unregulated or that the right is absolute (no such rights exist under our system). Re: Mandate to buy gun liability insurance? - August West - 04-03-2013 I think gun liability insurance is a good idea. Re: Mandate to buy gun liability insurance? - swampy - 04-03-2013 The people are the militia. And I guess you think using guns to hunt for food should have been unconstitutional? Our forefathers would have starved. Again davestar, you look like a fool. Re: Mandate to buy gun liability insurance? - max - 04-03-2013 RgrF wrote:You still know better, Roger. You do not need insurance to OWN a car, you need one to DRIVE it.... Re: Mandate to buy gun liability insurance? - (vikm) - 04-03-2013 August West wrote: As do I. |