![]() |
Time Magazine cover: "Nothing to See Here" - Printable Version +- MacResource (https://forums.macresource.com) +-- Forum: My Category (https://forums.macresource.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=1) +--- Forum: 'Friendly' Political Ranting (https://forums.macresource.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=6) +--- Thread: Time Magazine cover: "Nothing to See Here" (/showthread.php?tid=201834) Pages:
1
2
|
Re: Time Magazine cover: "Nothing to See Here" - Dennis S - 02-16-2017 mrbigstuff wrote: How did he know you weren't a Trump supporter? You weren't drooling? Re: Time Magazine cover: "Nothing to See Here" - Sam3 - 02-17-2017 Dennis S wrote: How did he know you weren't a Trump supporter? You weren't drooling? Maybe you looked like one of those brown moooslim terrerrists to him. :wall: Re: Time Magazine cover: "Nothing to See Here" - Onamuji - 02-17-2017 Steve G. wrote: Similar conversations, with modest differences: "Hillary's email isn't at issue" and "I don't think that immigrants are the source of Flynns problem." (BTW: Several conversations with republicans of various intellectual capacity and not one uses the phrase "illegal immigrants." The problem is always "immigrants.") Re: Time Magazine cover: "Nothing to See Here" - mrbigstuff - 02-17-2017 Onamuji wrote: Similar conversations, with modest differences: "Hillary's email isn't at issue" and "I don't think that immigrants are the source of Flynns problem." (BTW: Several conversations with republicans of various intellectual capacity and not one uses the phrase "illegal immigrants." The problem is always "immigrants.") Once you challenge them in the country's origins, they will break into the, "it's only the illegals that are the problem here." But, yes, the distinction is telling. |