MacResource
Judge cites Barr’s ‘misleading’ statements in ordering review of Mueller report redactions - Printable Version

+- MacResource (https://forums.macresource.com)
+-- Forum: My Category (https://forums.macresource.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: 'Friendly' Political Ranting (https://forums.macresource.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=6)
+--- Thread: Judge cites Barr’s ‘misleading’ statements in ordering review of Mueller report redactions (/showthread.php?tid=237986)

Pages: 1 2


Re: Judge cites Barr’s ‘misleading’ statements in ordering review of Mueller report redactions - Ted King - 03-07-2020

rjmacs wrote:
[quote=Ted King]
[quote=rjmacs]
Your use of the word "ought" bothers me most in your post, Ted.

I'm sorry, I'm not sure why it does. Is it because the "ought" ought to be an "is" but could very well not be?
It's not anything about you that bothers me. It's that empirically, Barr seems to take any interrogate any legal or ethical 'should' to see if it contains any 'must.' If not, he ignores it and does as he deems appropriate. That's a uniquely dangerous quality in an attorney general (or any law enforcement officer).
Oh, I got you. Yeah, I completely agree.


Re: Judge cites Barr’s ‘misleading’ statements in ordering review of Mueller report redactions - RgrF - 03-08-2020

It would seem that Barr is now fully vested with Trumpian logic ie: "He's the King and no tells the King he must do anything" ergo as his vassal I am told what I must do by no one but the King