![]() |
Murkowski!! - Printable Version +- MacResource (https://forums.macresource.com) +-- Forum: My Category (https://forums.macresource.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=1) +--- Forum: 'Friendly' Political Ranting (https://forums.macresource.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=6) +--- Thread: Murkowski!! (/showthread.php?tid=251411) Pages:
1
2
|
Re: Murkowski!! - rgG - 01-09-2021 Lux Interior wrote: ![]() Re: Murkowski!! - hal - 01-09-2021 TheCaber wrote: There WILL BE a pop quiz... (fails quiz) There will be ANOTHER quiz... Re: Murkowski!! - numbered - 01-09-2021 Nate Silver tweeted that Alaska has changed its primary system so that Murkowski can probably be on the ballot without needing GOP support. Remember that she was primaried before Trump, and won a write in campaign with Dem support. She is no Bernie, but if Schumer can offer the right incentives (e.g., committee assignments), we might not need Kamala as a tie breaker. Re: Murkowski!! - lost in space - 01-09-2021 Good to hear a voice of reason from that side. Re: Murkowski!! - gabester - 01-09-2021 numbered wrote: I think having Kamala BE the tie breaker is great exposure and makes her a much more active, participatory Veep than her predecessor... so ideally keep the numbers 50-50 as much as possible to wield the cudgel of the Vice Presidency. Re: Murkowski!! - btfc - 01-09-2021 Lisa Murkowski has been quietly pushing back for a while now, and has come a long way over the course of her career. If I saw her face to face, I’d shake her hand. Re: Murkowski!! - vision63 - 01-10-2021 btfc wrote: Without her, the ACA would be history. |