![]() |
Yep, this pic about says it all - Printable Version +- MacResource (https://forums.macresource.com) +-- Forum: My Category (https://forums.macresource.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=1) +--- Forum: 'Friendly' Political Ranting (https://forums.macresource.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=6) +--- Thread: Yep, this pic about says it all (/showthread.php?tid=252312) Pages:
1
2
|
Re: Yep, this pic about says it all - PeterB - 01-30-2021 rjmacs wrote: It's called relative deprivation, and its promoter within the study of political instability and ideological conflict was Ted Gurr. It's not about what they have. It's about the perceived gap between what they have and what they feel they ought to have, in particular relative to an imagined future based on current trends. The ideological component determines who or what is considered to be responsible for this gap, and resulting sense of deprivation. As wages and opportunities have stagnated for working people (blue and white collar), many White Americans have felt as though they should have better options and outcomes than they have realized, based on their expectations of the country and future. This is inseparable from the sense of entitlement that White people have become acculturated to over centuries of supremacist practices in this country. The elimination of a solid middle class and growing encroachment of non-Whites into spheres that confer advantage (higher education, for example) have left many Whites with substantial privilege feeling that they've been deprived of something they deserve, and when they look for a scapegoat, the growing non-White population makes for an easy target. Making America 'great again' is about the restoration of that upward trajectory for Whites, bolstered by a government that puts them first and an economy that rewards them disproportionately. In other words, MAGA = Make America White Again FTFY. Otherwise, your analysis is completely on point. Re: Yep, this pic about says it all - mrbigstuff - 01-30-2021 Steve G. wrote: And liberals, of course. They will vote against their interests because they hate "those people" more than they care about their own interests. That is what "we" don't and can't understand, because it makes so little sense to the rational mind. That's why Trumpism is a religion. Re: Yep, this pic about says it all - RgrF - 01-30-2021 So without "Libs" - we'd never have had Trump, is that the thesis? Re: Yep, this pic about says it all - Janit - 01-31-2021 RgrF wrote: No, they would have picked another scapegoat. |