![]() |
$265 for a hammer? - Printable Version +- MacResource (https://forums.macresource.com) +-- Forum: My Category (https://forums.macresource.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=1) +--- Forum: Tips and Deals (https://forums.macresource.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=3) +--- Thread: $265 for a hammer? (/showthread.php?tid=289988) |
Re: $265 for a hammer? - Acer - 09-05-2024 A lighter hammer is easier to lift, reducing arm fatigue. A lighter hammer, I would think, would have less inertia, meaning you have to use more arm force, increasing arm fatigue. :dunno: Re: $265 for a hammer? - sekker - 09-05-2024 Acer wrote: That's true if the energy transfer coefficient is the same. The argument is that Titanium is better. Re: $265 for a hammer? - cbelt3 - 09-05-2024 Think of it this way … “ Macs are so expensive !” It’s a tool that some people will use to make money. Re: $265 for a hammer? - NewtonMP2100 - 09-05-2024 ....worth it for M.C. Hammer..... Re: $265 for a hammer? - jonny - 09-05-2024 Why does wire cutter even encourage these people? Re: $265 for a hammer? - Numo - 09-05-2024 cbelt3 wrote: I assume that you mean the sellers, right? :-) Re: $265 for a hammer? - mattkime - 09-05-2024 If its your job to swing that thing all day it could easily be worth it. That said, I bet it would have a habit of walking off of job sites. Re: $265 for a hammer? - mrbigstuff - 09-05-2024 You folks haven't priced any Snap-On tools lately, I surmise. Ok, this is a bit more than even those, but not insane given the unobtanium content. Re: $265 for a hammer? - Blankity Blank - 09-05-2024 mattkime wrote: It's definitely a "If you "get it", you get it" thing. Or as yoots say now days, "If you know, you know." :biggrin: Re: $265 for a hammer? - pqrst - 09-05-2024 Sounds a little like the arguments I see on my Facebook pages about cameras, lens, quality, cell phone cameras, etc. everyone cones at it from a different direction, value system, budget, etc. discussion applies also to discussions about “ what kind of vehicle should I buy?” |