![]() |
Geithner to be Secretary of Treasury - Printable Version +- MacResource (https://forums.macresource.com) +-- Forum: My Category (https://forums.macresource.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=1) +--- Forum: 'Friendly' Political Ranting (https://forums.macresource.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=6) +--- Thread: Geithner to be Secretary of Treasury (/showthread.php?tid=66732) |
Re: Geithner to be Secretary of Treasury - mikeylikesit - 11-22-2008 Be as logical as you want, it won't register on the `peteometer. Re: Geithner to be Secretary of Treasury - decocritter - 11-23-2008 How does anyone know that this is why the stock market reacted? Re: Geithner to be Secretary of Treasury - AlphaDog - 11-23-2008 decocritter wrote: Because the WSJ said so. She this thread on the other side from yesterday! ![]() http://forums.macresource.com/read.php?1,609631 Re: Geithner to be Secretary of Treasury - Dennis S - 11-23-2008 "Any pick was a good pick at this point in time." What about Sarah Palin? What about Phil Gramm? Re: Geithner to be Secretary of Treasury - Stizzealth - 11-23-2008 Why won't you take a look at the graph of the market on the day Bush chose his SecTres during his transition period? But Bush is evil, evil, evil! Re: Geithner to be Secretary of Treasury - mikeylikesit - 11-23-2008 Clinton didn't leave Bush with a recession to deal with, your point was? Re: Geithner to be Secretary of Treasury - Stizzealth - 11-23-2008 My point was that whoever Obama picked would have buoyed the market. After all, everything Bush did was evil, right? He eats babies for breakfast, so he MUST have picked a bad SecTres! Re: Geithner to be Secretary of Treasury - Dennis S - 11-23-2008 I don't think he ate babies, but he sure was responsible for a lot of them dieing. Re: Geithner to be Secretary of Treasury - Stizzealth - 11-24-2008 Bush lied, people died! Bush lied, people died! Re: Geithner to be Secretary of Treasury - Gutenberg - 11-24-2008 First correct thing you have said since you signed up here. |