+- MacResource (https://forums.macresource.com)
+-- Forum: My Category (https://forums.macresource.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: 'Friendly' Political Ranting (https://forums.macresource.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=6)
+--- Thread: Maybe Pay for Performance might not be a bad deal... (/showthread.php?tid=75462)
Pages:
1
2
Re: Maybe Pay for Performance might not be a bad deal... - RgrF - 04-01-2009
freeradical wrote:
[quote=samintx]
Barney is such a loser. How do people like this keep getting elected?
One word:
Gerrymandering
Shows 'radical's grasp of politics.
Barney Frank was NOT gerrymandered into his seat if fact it's a good bet you'd have liked his predecessor even less, the last Catholic priest to serve in Congress the late Rev. Robert Drinan. A former dean of the Boston College School of Law, who'd of identified closely with the current president.
Re: Maybe Pay for Performance might not be a bad deal... - JoeH - 04-01-2009
Heck yeah, Mass. invented gerrymandering almost 2 centuries ago, we've moved on way past that kind of thing. It's so 19th century.
As for his predecessor, that is the late Rev. Robert Drinan, SJ to be precise. A credit to an order that has prided itself on producing rational thinkers capable of fine use of logic and teaching others in that usage. As a formerly observant member of the church, members of that order were the ones I most often found and still find tolerable holding an intelligent conversation with.
Re: Maybe Pay for Performance might not be a bad deal... - $tevie - 04-01-2009
Lux Interior wrote:
Rush knows his audience, that's for sure!
[quote=2112]
"Yeah, OK, well -- ask you a question here: With whose money are they going to pay for your car payment? Mine, dingleberry, and every other taxpayer's."
So Rush talks to his dingleberries now. Why am I not surprised?
Re: Maybe Pay for Performance might not be a bad deal... - RgrF - 04-02-2009
Dingelberries are fun to have around, they never talk back and agree with everything you think or say before you even say it.