![]() |
HD Radio? better than FM? - Printable Version +- MacResource (https://forums.macresource.com) +-- Forum: My Category (https://forums.macresource.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=1) +--- Forum: Tips and Deals (https://forums.macresource.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=3) +--- Thread: HD Radio? better than FM? (/showthread.php?tid=76508) Pages:
1
2
|
Re: HD Radio? better than FM? - Sam3 - 04-17-2009 This blog doesn't think much of it http://hdradiofarce.blogspot.com/ Re: HD Radio? better than FM? - freeradical - 04-17-2009 Black wrote: Listening to the radio in your office is far different from listening to the radio driving in a car. In a moving car you can have severe multipath fades due to receiving a radio signal not only direct from the transmitter antenna, but reflections off of buildings as well. With a normal FM radio, you simply experience a degraded signal to noise ratio, but with digital radio you will experience a catastrophic failure all at once. Have you ever noticed that if you're sitting at a stoplight and getting poor radio reception that you can just move your car up a tiny bit and everything is better? This is the result of multiple radio sources going into or out of phase. The last few MP3's I've d/l from the iTunes store were 256 Kb/s. I didn't even know that they still sold MP3's encoded at 128K. Re: HD Radio? better than FM? - Doc - 04-17-2009 > Nice being able to see who the DJ and the artist/song are on the display. You can get that from most radio stations these days. It's called RDS. No HD radio required. In fact, when I went new car shopping last year, I didn't spot a single radio that didn't support it. Re: HD Radio? better than FM? - Black - 04-17-2009 I apologize to all who have participated in this thread from the bottom of my heart, but I like my HD radio. A lot. |