+- MacResource (https://forums.macresource.com)
+-- Forum: My Category (https://forums.macresource.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: 'Friendly' Political Ranting (https://forums.macresource.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=6)
+--- Thread: Associated Press phone records seized (/showthread.php?tid=152546)
Re: Associated Press phone records seized - Lemon Drop - 05-14-2013
AP never saw the subpoena, it would have gone to the phone companies, right? I think it was all done without AP's knowledge, which is part of what has them so (justifiably) angry.
Re: Associated Press phone records seized - max - 05-15-2013
Speedy wrote:
Sadly transparency is proving difficult.
Ted King wrote:
Though it's certainly possible, I doubt that Obama had personally okayed what happened ....
Speedy wrote:
The troublesome part...
Ted King wrote:
Obama seems to be lost ....
$tevie wrote:
I do not understand .....
Your scathing criticism recognizing this venal criminal incompetecy at the highest levels of our ruling regime is somewhat encouraging.
You missed couple terms you customarily apply when Holy Saviour truly betrays you: so dissapointing, ill advised.
The fact is you knew exactly what you voted for in the last election, every single one of you. That was a very conscious choice YOU made.
Every one of you is guilty....
Re: Associated Press phone records seized - Mac-A-Matic - 05-15-2013
$tevie wrote:
...but sometimes I think he's an enthusiastic believer in trampling on freedom. It is upsetting to say the least.
Considering that liberty and freedom is the cornerstone of what supposedly makes our nation great.
Re: Associated Press phone records seized - Mac-A-Matic - 05-15-2013
Gutenberg wrote:
No. There were no wiretaps. But they had to have had some kind of authorization to seize the records and I am guessing--I do not know--that they used FISA. I don't know where else you can get a secret subpoena.
That's kind of the idea - for no one to know because its a secret subpoena.
Re: Associated Press phone records seized - max - 05-16-2013
Lemon Drop wrote:
AP never saw the subpoena, it would have gone to the phone companies, right? I think it was all done without AP's knowledge, which is part of what has them so (justifiably) angry.
That is the cute part, Holder IS informed that he is a subject of investigation, AP is not.....