![]() |
From the "Too much information" Department - Printable Version +- MacResource (https://forums.macresource.com) +-- Forum: My Category (https://forums.macresource.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=1) +--- Forum: Tips and Deals (https://forums.macresource.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=3) +--- Thread: From the "Too much information" Department (/showthread.php?tid=87992) |
Re: From the "Too much information" Department - freeradical - 11-19-2009 JoeH wrote: Then you have not seen it on a wide enough sample of the fairer sex. Bad memory!! :devil: [spoiler=This picture has to have been photoshopped - I hope...] ![]() [/spoiler] Re: From the "Too much information" Department - ka jowct - 11-19-2009 When I see middle school boys showing up in pants like this, 4 sizes too small with their entire butt exposed.....is that really any better? No, the skinny ones look even goofier than the baggy ones. Thong-man's pants were not baggy, they were the skinny type, worn way too low. Mattkime, I don't know if his junk was visible; the viewing angle didn't permit clarification on that point, for which I am grateful. Where's cold weather in November when you need it? I can't imagine that having half one's ass exposed to the air would be fun in 30-degree weather. |