![]() |
Why is Apple still selling MacBook Pro 13 with Disc Drive 2012? - Printable Version +- MacResource (https://forums.macresource.com) +-- Forum: My Category (https://forums.macresource.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=1) +--- Forum: Tips and Deals (https://forums.macresource.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=3) +--- Thread: Why is Apple still selling MacBook Pro 13 with Disc Drive 2012? (/showthread.php?tid=174122) |
Re: Why is Apple still selling MacBook Pro 13 with Disc Drive 2012? - riley5108 - 12-08-2014 sekker wrote:I agree!! It had everything I wanted and needed when I bought it new back in Mid 2012. Going with 8GB of Ram was a good decision, which makes it pretty dang fast. Re: Why is Apple still selling MacBook Pro 13 with Disc Drive 2012? - Lux Interior - 12-08-2014 sekker wrote: sekker wrote: Are you posting in RAID setup? Re: Why is Apple still selling MacBook Pro 13 with Disc Drive 2012? - Onamuji - 12-08-2014 gabester wrote: You forget about the MacBook Air? Any of them will do that, and do it better than the 13" MBP. Forgive me for citing a PM with Onamuji here: Onamuji wrote: Thanks - yes, using Configurator is exactly what I'm talking about. See here: http://help.apple.com/configurator/mac/1.7/#/cadbf9a73b "Use powered USB 2.0 high-speed hubs or carts that support multiple simultaneous device syncing." There's a technical limit on MacBook Airs such that they can only support simultaneous syncing of just 20 devices at a time, whereas the older 13" MBP w/HDD can support 30 or more. I'm not sure what the technical limit is, I'm still trying to get that detail from my Apple team. I think it has to do with bus power? On the subject of Configurator deployments: I have been instructed (repeatedly) that although you can do 30 iPads at once in theory, in practice you should limit it to 20 due to technical issues with the software. So, I'm not sure how advantageous the MBP really is in that scenario. Re: Why is Apple still selling MacBook Pro 13 with Disc Drive 2012? - RAMd®d - 12-08-2014 So they can offer a product for customers who want any of the following features. Built in Ethernet port Built in FireWire port Built in Optical Drive Price of $1099 Not to put too fine a point in it, I doubt Apple is really concerned about a user wanting to upgrade the HD and RAM, or LEDs. Sure, these are reasons a lot of people would/do want an MBP, but I don't see Apple caring about it. If I were to bet money, it would be on the optical drive, and the price. And maybe the Ethernet. I think Apple is cognizant of a market segment that doesn't or can't rely on a wireless network and/or Internet connection for installing software. And Ethernet offers simple security over Wireless, though that might not be on Apple whiteboard. In reading this thread, that MBP is tempting for the money. But that Retina display keeps calling meeeeeee e-e-eeeee… Re: Why is Apple still selling MacBook Pro 13 with Disc Drive 2012? - Filliam H. Muffman - 12-08-2014 Ombligo wrote: It is more than that. Marketing has been dictating engineering limitations to the hardware design teams since the early '90's. It has just been getting progressively worse every hardware release since the G4 mini shipped. Re: Why is Apple still selling MacBook Pro 13 with Disc Drive 2012? - GGD - 12-08-2014 Filliam H. Muffman wrote: It is more than that. Marketing has been dictating engineering limitations to the hardware design teams since the early '90's. It has just been getting progressively worse every hardware release since the G4 mini shipped. I'd be willing to bet that the only reason why Ethernet has been dropped is because the connector was too tall for the thinner MBPR body. FireWire likely met the same fate. Re: Why is Apple still selling MacBook Pro 13 with Disc Drive 2012? - DRR - 12-20-2014 GGD wrote: It is more than that. Marketing has been dictating engineering limitations to the hardware design teams since the early '90's. It has just been getting progressively worse every hardware release since the G4 mini shipped. I'd be willing to bet that the only reason why Ethernet has been dropped is because the connector was too tall for the thinner MBPR body. FireWire likely met the same fate. Exactly right. Add to that, Magsafe V1. |