![]() |
So, what ahppened to He who must not be named? - Printable Version +- MacResource (https://forums.macresource.com) +-- Forum: My Category (https://forums.macresource.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=1) +--- Forum: 'Friendly' Political Ranting (https://forums.macresource.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=6) +--- Thread: So, what ahppened to He who must not be named? (/showthread.php?tid=125841) |
Re: So, what ahppened to He who must not be named? - Rick-o - 10-24-2011 SDGuy wrote: Hey now...don't be draggin' in our friendly forum hosts into this ; ) Heh! Now THAT was funny! ( ![]() Re: So, what ahppened to He who must not be named? - Black - 10-24-2011 Ted King wrote: Oh, duh, slap self on head, that's probably what happened. Bet you're wrong. Oh, come on, you can't say we shouldn't be talking about this and then lay that out there. ![]() OK, OK, here's the skinny. [spoiler=The Skinny] The posts were hidden, not deleted. [/spoiler] Satisfied? Re: So, what ahppened to He who must not be named? - Lux Interior - 10-24-2011 swampy wrote: I am proud that you admit conservatives do not support the Constitution and can call them on it! ![]() Re: So, what ahppened to He who must not be named? - Ted King - 10-24-2011 Black wrote: Oh, duh, slap self on head, that's probably what happened. Bet you're wrong. Oh, come on, you can't say we shouldn't be talking about this and then lay that out there. ![]() OK, OK, here's the skinny. [spoiler=The Skinny] The posts were hidden, not deleted. [/spoiler] Satisfied? No. Re: So, what ahppened to He who must not be named? - Uncle Wig - 10-24-2011 swampy wrote: You've only named ONE substantial issue. Try again. Re: So, what ahppened to He who must not be named? - swampy - 10-24-2011 The question was posed as follows, Ted Ted wrote: • Abortion=disagree with conservatives • Ron Paul is a jerk = agree with liberals • Obama did a good job on Bin Laden = Agree with liberals • Obama did a good job on Anwar al-Awlaqi= Agree with liberals • OWC demonstrators have a right to protest = agree with liberals Clearer, now? Re: So, what ahppened to He who must not be named? - swampy - 10-24-2011 Butt out, uncle Wig, Ted asked the question. Re: So, what ahppened to He who must not be named? - Uncle Wig - 10-24-2011 swampy wrote: :booty: Re: So, what ahppened to He who must not be named? - JoeH - 10-25-2011 Black wrote: Oh, duh, slap self on head, that's probably what happened. Bet you're wrong. Oh, come on, you can't say we shouldn't be talking about this and then lay that out there. ![]() OK, OK, here's the skinny. [spoiler=The Skinny] The posts were hidden, not deleted. [/spoiler] Satisfied? You say potatah, I say potato, what's the difference? :biggrin: Re: So, what ahppened to He who must not be named? - Carnos Jax - 10-25-2011 . |