![]() |
THEY HAVE REACHED A VERDICT - Printable Version +- MacResource (https://forums.macresource.com) +-- Forum: My Category (https://forums.macresource.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=1) +--- Forum: 'Friendly' Political Ranting (https://forums.macresource.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=6) +--- Thread: THEY HAVE REACHED A VERDICT (/showthread.php?tid=276980) |
Re: THEY HAVE REACHED A VERDICT - AllGold - 05-10-2023 cbelt3 wrote: Did they actually screw up and say "innocent" instead of "not guilty"? Re: THEY HAVE REACHED A VERDICT - GGD - 05-10-2023 AllGold wrote: Did they actually screw up and say "innocent" instead of "not guilty"? I wonder why he's planning to appeal this "victory". Re: THEY HAVE REACHED A VERDICT - Lux Interior - 05-10-2023 RgrF wrote: Is that an true? Thought that went with criminal proceedings. Seems he'd of fought to avoid such a label. If not, you will just have to call him an UN-registered sex offender. It's only fair. Re: THEY HAVE REACHED A VERDICT - RAMd®d - 05-10-2023 Did they actually screw up and say "innocent" instead of "not guilty"? They didn't screw up. Using 'innocent' was very deliberate. They just exercised their entertainment branding and spin. Is that an true? Thought that went with criminal proceedings. No, and yes, in that order. It was in civil, not criminal court, fortunately or unfortunately. Fortunately, because I think it would have gone far worse for Ms. Carroll in criminal court. |