MacResource
Are these insane birthers, tea-baggers, etc. helping or hurting the Republican party? - Printable Version

+- MacResource (https://forums.macresource.com)
+-- Forum: My Category (https://forums.macresource.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: 'Friendly' Political Ranting (https://forums.macresource.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=6)
+--- Thread: Are these insane birthers, tea-baggers, etc. helping or hurting the Republican party? (/showthread.php?tid=84394)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5


Re: Are these insane birthers, tea-baggers, etc. helping or hurting the Republican party? - davester - 09-16-2009

It'd be interesting to see what reasoning our forum teabaggers use (is that an oxymoron?) to come to the conclusion that a communist by definition doesn't believe in the constitution. If anything this statement seems to indicate that the teabaggers themselves don't even know what's in the constitution.


Re: Are these insane birthers, tea-baggers, etc. helping or hurting the Republican party? - $tevie - 09-16-2009

AND they have no idea what communism is.


Re: Are these insane birthers, tea-baggers, etc. helping or hurting the Republican party? - Mac1337 - 09-16-2009

$tevie wrote:
AND they have no idea what communism is.

Does this help you in any way? Poor souls who are sitting in Havana and hoping the likes of you will be coming to their help.





Re: Are these insane birthers, tea-baggers, etc. helping or hurting the Republican party? - mattkime - 09-17-2009

>>Poor souls who are sitting in Havana and hoping the likes of you will be coming to their help.

They're as likely to be sitting around and waiting for our help as we are waiting for theirs.


Re: Are these insane birthers, tea-baggers, etc. helping or hurting the Republican party? - Dennis S - 09-17-2009

What happened to Bush's War Czar? You nuts don't even realize the administration doesn't call people czars. It's the media and Fox News that does.


Re: Are these insane birthers, tea-baggers, etc. helping or hurting the Republican party? - Mac1337 - 09-17-2009

They don't call them communist either. They just quietly fire them at midnight Sundays.


Re: Are these insane birthers, tea-baggers, etc. helping or hurting the Republican party? - Dennis S - 09-17-2009

davester wrote:
It'd be interesting to see what reasoning our forum teabaggers use (is that an oxymoron?) to come to the conclusion that a communist by definition doesn't believe in the constitution. If anything this statement seems to indicate that the teabaggers themselves don't even know what's in the constitution.

The nutters have no idea what they are talking about. They'll call the same person a communist, a socialist and a fascist. As someone said, "Healthcare is the least of our problems. We have an education problem."


Re: Are these insane birthers, tea-baggers, etc. helping or hurting the Republican party? - mattkime - 09-17-2009

>>They don't call them communist either. They just quietly fire them at midnight Sundays.




Re: Are these insane birthers, tea-baggers, etc. helping or hurting the Republican party? - RgrF - 09-18-2009

\If Republicans had gotten everything they wanted for the last seventy-five years or so, the United States of America would have no Social Security, no Medicare, no Aid to Dependent Children, no civil rights, no environmental protections, no privacy rights to make contraception legal. There would be no business taxes, either,...

... On the other hand, consider what the Republicans gave Americans during their last eight years in power: They were asleep at the switch when Osama bin Laden attacked, overreacted by invading a country that had not attacked us (at the cost of about $1 trillion dollars and hundreds of thousands of lives), saddled the country with $43 billion a year in unfunded Medicare mandates and another $1.7 trillion in unfunded tax cuts for the rich ($2.5 trillion according to a new study by Citizens for Tax Justice [PDF wrote:
) — then followed their market fundamentalist ideology right over the economic cliff and sent the whole planet spinning into recession."]
more here about GOP contributions to the common welfare