MacResource
About stinkin time, Nikon announces 70-200mm f/4 $1400 so thanks for nothing - Printable Version

+- MacResource (https://forums.macresource.com)
+-- Forum: My Category (https://forums.macresource.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Tips and Deals (https://forums.macresource.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=3)
+--- Thread: About stinkin time, Nikon announces 70-200mm f/4 $1400 so thanks for nothing (/showthread.php?tid=143318)



About stinkin time, Nikon announces 70-200mm f/4 $1400 so thanks for nothing - pRICE cUBE - 10-24-2012

Canon had this lens for about a decade now, about 4 years on the optically stabilized version. The Canon version is $1100. In December you will be able to but a Tamron 70-200mm 2.8 with optical stabilizer for about $1500. The Sigma 70-200mm 2.8 OS is about $1500 also. You can get a gently used 70-200mm 2.8 Nikon version 1 VR for about $1300. You can buy a non optically stabilized 70-200mm 2.8 Tamron for $800.

http://www.dpreview.com/news/2012/10/24/Nikon-70-200mm-f4-vr-with-claimed-5-stop-image-stabilization


Re: About stinkin time, Nikon announces 70-200mm f/4 $1400 so thanks for nothing - NewtonMP2100 - 10-24-2012

....something about this SMELLS funny....


Re: About stinkin time, Nikon announces 70-200mm f/4 $1400 so thanks for nothing - DP - 10-24-2012

Don't sugar coat it, pRICE... Tell us how you really feel!


Re: About stinkin time, Nikon announces 70-200mm f/4 $1400 so thanks for nothing - wowzer - 10-24-2012

I'm with pRice on this one. I'm not really sure why a 70-200 f4.0 VR should cost $1400. For that price, I'd get a used 70-200 f2.8 VR1 or the sigma 70-200 OS.


Re: About stinkin time, Nikon announces 70-200mm f/4 $1400 so thanks for nothing - mrbigstuff - 10-24-2012

a full stop for $100? I'd take that, if IQ holds up.


Re: About stinkin time, Nikon announces 70-200mm f/4 $1400 so thanks for nothing - Billybob - 10-24-2012

When I switched from Canon to Nikon (well, not a complete switch), this was one of the lenses that I wish Nikon had an equivalency.

Now, I wonder why.

Frankly, if I did action photography, I'd bite the bullet and get an f/2.8.

Otherwise, I want my telephoto lens to go to 300mm or 400mm.