MacResource
It ain't over until the Supremes sing - Printable Version

+- MacResource (https://forums.macresource.com)
+-- Forum: My Category (https://forums.macresource.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: 'Friendly' Political Ranting (https://forums.macresource.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=6)
+--- Thread: It ain't over until the Supremes sing (/showthread.php?tid=144098)



It ain't over until the Supremes sing - Speedy - 11-07-2012

Gov. Romney's camp isn't conceding anything.


Re: It ain't over until the Supremes sing - kap - 11-07-2012

True. My vote hasn't been counted yet :biggrin:


Re: It ain't over until the Supremes sing - deckeda - 11-07-2012

Who told you that?


Re: It ain't over until the Supremes sing - graylocks - 11-07-2012

i just heard them singing in the background at Obama headquarters.


Re: It ain't over until the Supremes sing - Speedy - 11-07-2012

They still see a "path to victory." Must have to do with who is running elections in Florida and Ohio.


Re: It ain't over until the Supremes sing - rgG - 11-07-2012

The Supreme Court is going to sing?


Re: It ain't over until the Supremes sing - gabester - 11-07-2012

With how much money has been thrown into Rapuglican campaigns this election by the superwealthy you can be sure a lot of very pricey lawyers are at this point salivating at the opportunity to force all kinds of election litigation involved with votes and how they were counted.

With that said, as in the NFL when Refs seem to balance out their bad calls to make the end result of the game fair, I have to hope the Supremes will do the same and offset their mistake in 2000 with the Gore/Bush case.

I'd be interested to see how the vote totals come out were we to modify the Electoral College to operate more like Maine and Nebraska so it's not winner takes all. I only say this because there's such a strong urban/rural divide.
g=