![]() |
Is it really a 'civil war' if a nation defends against an invader ? - Printable Version +- MacResource (https://forums.macresource.com) +-- Forum: My Category (https://forums.macresource.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=1) +--- Forum: 'Friendly' Political Ranting (https://forums.macresource.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=6) +--- Thread: Is it really a 'civil war' if a nation defends against an invader ? (/showthread.php?tid=166048) |
Is it really a 'civil war' if a nation defends against an invader ? - cbelt3 - 04-08-2014 Because Russia thinks it is. http://www.cnn.com/2014/04/08/world/europe/ukraine-crisis/index.html?hpt=hp_bn2 Expect Ukraine to be gobbled up, while the International community twiddles their thumbs. Who is next ? Re: Is it really a 'civil war' if a nation defends against an invader ? - SteveG - 04-08-2014 I expect bold and swift action by the Euro Zone stalwarts. Re: Is it really a 'civil war' if a nation defends against an invader ? - cbelt3 - 04-08-2014 Steve G. wrote: They will wait until late Autumn to being the assault. Everyone knows a winter war is the best way to deal with Russia. Re: Is it really a 'civil war' if a nation defends against an invader ? - Acer - 04-08-2014 ![]() Re: Is it really a 'civil war' if a nation defends against an invader ? - vision63 - 04-09-2014 Based on the number of responses, I think we've all conceded whatever parts Russia wants. Nobody wants to duke it out with them. Re: Is it really a 'civil war' if a nation defends against an invader ? - Bill in NC - 04-09-2014 Well, if they occupy eastern Ukraine up to the Dnieper there'll still be a Ukraine...albeit a much smaller one. vision63 wrote: |