MacResource
The reduction of competition is relentless for TV. - Printable Version

+- MacResource (https://forums.macresource.com)
+-- Forum: My Category (https://forums.macresource.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Tips and Deals (https://forums.macresource.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=3)
+--- Thread: The reduction of competition is relentless for TV. (/showthread.php?tid=178786)

Pages: 1 2


The reduction of competition is relentless for TV. - deckeda - 04-29-2015

We as a nation are good and truly addicted. And I mean that in the most unfortunate and unhealthy way possible. Keep writing those monthly checks, folks. Continue to reward them, they've earned it. Sorry for the rant, but it is what it is.

Charter to try once again for Time Warner Cable. AT&T to likely gobble up DirecTV.

That last one disturbs me the most. Some years ago a DirecTV and Dish merger was seen as wildly verboten, but one of them being eaten by the nation's largest cell and DSL provider is OK, different. And once again, making AT&T give concessions isn't seen a red flag. For some reason.

http://arstechnica.com/business/2015/04/27/attdirectv-merger-likely-to-be-approved/


Re: The reduction of competition is relentless for TV. - sekker - 04-29-2015

We are hosed in the US.


Re: The reduction of competition is relentless for TV. - silvarios - 04-29-2015

I don't pay for traditional TV. I have OTA and I have Netflix, well Amazon has Prime video with my Prime sub. Let all the TV companies gobble themselves up. I'll keep scrounging around for the cheap/free leftovers.

However, I'm very concerned about Internet access. That's the true battleground.


Re: The reduction of competition is relentless for TV. - OWC Jamie - 04-29-2015

Banks, internet access, soon insurance.
Too big to fail.


Re: The reduction of competition is relentless for TV. - cbelt3 - 04-29-2015

sekker wrote:
We are hosed in the US.

It's all about the last mile and the use of civic grant monopolies, which were 'required' in the early days of wiring. That logic is gone, but the laws put in place to support it are still there.

Pretty much this is the 21st century of Ma Bell.


Re: The reduction of competition is relentless for TV. - RAMd®d - 04-29-2015

You could mine enough fluorite and slowly anneal enough of it to make a blank but I'd wager that would take years to make just one and it would probably cost upwards of $10M.

Not to mention you'd get pretty tired carrying it around.

And where're you going to find a UV filter for that?


Re: The reduction of competition is relentless for TV. - Filliam H. Muffman - 04-29-2015

I was talking to the Comcast installer last week. He was all 'Comcast gigabit fiber optic! RSN!' I said Samsung S8 on Google cellular with 400 Mbps in your hand. Another "My god, it's full of stars!' moment.


Re: The reduction of competition is relentless for TV. - SteveG - 04-29-2015

It's time to renegotiate and end the tenure of cable franchise holders. Your elected representative is the key here.


Re: The reduction of competition is relentless for TV. - N-OS X-tasy! - 04-29-2015

RAMd®d wrote:
You could mine enough fluorite and slowly anneal enough of it to make a blank but I'd wager that would take years to make just one and it would probably cost upwards of $10M.

Not to mention you'd get pretty tired carrying it around.

And where're you going to find a UV filter for that?

Huh?


Re: The reduction of competition is relentless for TV. - Lew Zealand - 04-29-2015

N-OS X-tasy! wrote:
[quote=RAMd®d]
You could mine enough fluorite and slowly anneal enough of it to make a blank but I'd wager that would take years to make just one and it would probably cost upwards of $10M.

Not to mention you'd get pretty tired carrying it around.

And where're you going to find a UV filter for that?

Huh?
Supposed to be in the thread below. Did not make it to the proper circle of hell, held up in the HR department.