![]() |
Acer 24" monitor ~ $90 @ Amazon for a limited time - Printable Version +- MacResource (https://forums.macresource.com) +-- Forum: My Category (https://forums.macresource.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=1) +--- Forum: Tips and Deals (https://forums.macresource.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=3) +--- Thread: Acer 24" monitor ~ $90 @ Amazon for a limited time (/showthread.php?tid=192584) |
Acer 24" monitor ~ $90 @ Amazon for a limited time - Carnos Jax - 07-05-2016 Acer KA240H 24-inch Full HD (1920 x 1080) Display (VGA, DVI Ports): https://www.amazon.com/Acer-KA240H-24-inch-Display-Ports/dp/B01EG8RLIA Re: Acer 24" monitor ~ $90 @ Amazon for a limited time - Speedy - 07-05-2016 Prime members only. Re: Acer 24" monitor ~ $90 @ Amazon for a limited time - silvarios - 07-05-2016 Viewing angle or panel type would be helpful. Couldn't find it on the Amazon site. Even so, thanks for the link! Re: Acer 24" monitor ~ $90 @ Amazon for a limited time - silvarios - 07-05-2016 It's a TN panel according to Acer. Still not bad for a basic monitor, but unfortunately won't suit my purpose. I need viewing angles to be wider. Thanks again. Re: Acer 24" monitor ~ $90 @ Amazon for a limited time - jdc - 07-05-2016 For $90, wouldnt expect much in the way of quality... seems like there have been some pretty decent ones in the $120 range recently. Re: Acer 24" monitor ~ $90 @ Amazon for a limited time - RAMd®d - 07-06-2016 For $90, I wouldn't expect much of a monitor. It was $150. But if someone didn't need a bunch of features and the *reliability* was decent, it's probably not a bad buy. Sometimes bare bones is plenty serviceable. Re: Acer 24" monitor ~ $90 @ Amazon for a limited time - silvarios - 07-06-2016 RAMd®d wrote: I agree. For $90, not a big loss for the average user, but at $150, would be a tough sell. Re: Acer 24" monitor ~ $90 @ Amazon for a limited time - Racer X - 07-06-2016 Why does almost everyone stop at 1080 vert rez these days? I know its HD, but why not go bigger? Re: Acer 24" monitor ~ $90 @ Amazon for a limited time - silvarios - 07-06-2016 Racer X wrote: I suppose aspect ratios. To go bigger requires more horizontal pixels. |