![]() |
No mention here yet of SCOTUS and NC Gerrymandering? - Printable Version +- MacResource (https://forums.macresource.com) +-- Forum: My Category (https://forums.macresource.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=1) +--- Forum: 'Friendly' Political Ranting (https://forums.macresource.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=6) +--- Thread: No mention here yet of SCOTUS and NC Gerrymandering? (/showthread.php?tid=212851) Pages:
1
2
|
No mention here yet of SCOTUS and NC Gerrymandering? - gabester - 01-20-2018 I'm surprised no one else here commented on it yet... I was just starting to have a good feeling about the country's direction, with the unanimous decision from the appeals court and a couple other positive events, so for the Supes to turn around and put the kibosh on it when there is such a clear and present need to address partisan politics - and national risk what with the potential for foreign disinformation compaigns - but it sounds like they're going to make the voters wait to get their representation. I suppose the rationale is that, with the tax cuts in place, there's no need for representation either. Re: No mention here yet of SCOTUS and NC Gerrymandering? - sekker - 01-20-2018 They accepted the Texas case at the same time. I believe they want to make a comprehensive decision - and I cannot believe that's status quo. Re: No mention here yet of SCOTUS and NC Gerrymandering? - mattkime - 01-20-2018 Yeah, I have no idea what to make of it. No fucking way this is an acceptable way of doing things. If you define how gerrymandered districts can be, they'll just go right up to the line. In retrospect, this was always a crazy way to do things, it just took a while for the necessary info to be available. Re: No mention here yet of SCOTUS and NC Gerrymandering? - sekker - 01-20-2018 538 has a great recent set of podcasts on gerrymandering. I highly recommend. Re: No mention here yet of SCOTUS and NC Gerrymandering? - $tevie - 01-20-2018 sekker wrote:Thanks for the suggestion. Re: No mention here yet of SCOTUS and NC Gerrymandering? - Speedy - 01-20-2018 The SCOTUS will vote 5-4 in favor of the status quo. Re: No mention here yet of SCOTUS and NC Gerrymandering? - $tevie - 01-20-2018 Speedy, I have figured out who you are in real life! ![]() Re: No mention here yet of SCOTUS and NC Gerrymandering? - Speedy - 01-20-2018 $tevie wrote: What's there to feel good about? Re: No mention here yet of SCOTUS and NC Gerrymandering? - $tevie - 01-20-2018 Don't let the bastards get you down. Re: No mention here yet of SCOTUS and NC Gerrymandering? - Lemon Drop - 01-20-2018 . |