![]() |
Pro photographer sues Gannett for republishing images from Twitter feed - Printable Version +- MacResource (https://forums.macresource.com) +-- Forum: My Category (https://forums.macresource.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=1) +--- Forum: Tips and Deals (https://forums.macresource.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=3) +--- Thread: Pro photographer sues Gannett for republishing images from Twitter feed (/showthread.php?tid=253000) Pages:
1
2
|
Pro photographer sues Gannett for republishing images from Twitter feed - rjmacs - 02-16-2021 Pro photographer Aaron Babcock took a picture of Bill Murray at a Nebraska/Purdue football game in 2018, and published it to his Twitter feed. Gannett publishing reposted the picture to four of its website without permission from Babcock, and the photographer has sued for copyright infringement. Gannett argues that Twitter's TOS allow it to republish images without permission or compensation. A judge has denied Gannett's efforts to have the suit dismissed, and the case may have wide-ranging implications, particularly for sports photographers. Re: Pro photographer sues Gannett for republishing images from Twitter feed - hal - 02-16-2021 "Gannett argues that Twitter's TOS allow it to republish images without permission or compensation" that's quite an argument... Re: Pro photographer sues Gannett for republishing images from Twitter feed - vision63 - 02-16-2021 hal wrote: I'm pretty sure he's happy they used his image without his permission. Re: Pro photographer sues Gannett for republishing images from Twitter feed - rz - 02-16-2021 vision63 wrote: I'm pretty sure he's happy they used his image without his permission. Or, he will be once a settlement is reached. Re: Pro photographer sues Gannett for republishing images from Twitter feed - AllGold - 02-16-2021 hal wrote: Unfortunately, I'll bet Gannett is 100% correct. The real problem here is Twitter and Facebook, etc. Re: Pro photographer sues Gannett for republishing images from Twitter feed - vision63 - 02-16-2021 AllGold wrote: Unfortunately, I'll bet Gannett is 100% correct. The real problem here is Twitter and Facebook, etc. Or people using using Twitter and Facebook as if they are customers instead of what they really are, their products. Re: Pro photographer sues Gannett for republishing images from Twitter feed - Blankity Blank - 02-16-2021 Twitter’s TOS can supersede copyright law? My understanding has been that even if signed, illegal aspects of a contract are still unenforceable. Wouldn’t this get messy for any copyright holder posting content on the platform? Movie trailers, article excerpts, etc.? It seems they’re position is that once posted to Twitter, content essentially becomes public domain, usable by anyone without limitation or compensation. Re: Pro photographer sues Gannett for republishing images from Twitter feed - vision63 - 02-16-2021 Blankity Blank wrote: I believe so. It's not clear what your "creative commons" terms are on Twitter and Facebook etc., like you can specify on photography specific sites. Normally, a media entity will seek permission to use your image from Twitter. I'm sure they'd pay his fee if he asked them, but he sued them, so now it's a war. Re: Pro photographer sues Gannett for republishing images from Twitter feed - AllGold - 02-17-2021 I don't know how it ultimately works out, but I do know among professional photographers this is a continual controversy because services like Twitter, Instagram, etc. are always, ALWAYS trying to pull this crap with their TOSs that say if you post it on our service then we can do anything we darn well please with it. I don't know if that attempted theft really extends to all their users or just the service itself. In my opinion, it's part of a larger problem where corporations with their army of lawyers create excessive contracts and TOSs against regular people who don't have an army of lawyers. Re: Pro photographer sues Gannett for republishing images from Twitter feed - pRICE cUBE - 02-17-2021 AllGold wrote: You said what I was about to say. It will be interesting how courts rule on this. |