+- MacResource (https://forums.macresource.com)
+-- Forum: My Category (https://forums.macresource.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: 'Friendly' Political Ranting (https://forums.macresource.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=6)
+--- Thread: From out of California: California's"one-gun-a-month" law ruled Unconstitutional (/showthread.php?tid=285533)
From out of California: California's"one-gun-a-month" law ruled Unconstitutional - SDGuy - 03-12-2024
Saw that this came out of the United States District Court, Southern District of California yesterday.
Bottomline:
California's one firearm purchase in any 30-day period ruled Unconstitutional, and "enforcement of the judgment is stayed for thirty (30) days to facilitate an appeal."
Re: From out of California: California's"one-gun-a-month" law ruled Unconstitutional - hal - 03-12-2024
I hate 2A SO MUCH!
Re: From out of California: California's"one-gun-a-month" law ruled Unconstitutional - Acer - 03-12-2024
We hold this truth to be self-evident: GUNS.
Re: From out of California: California's"one-gun-a-month" law ruled Unconstitutional - mrbigstuff - 03-12-2024
Get your first 13 guns for One Penny! Just sign up to buy 12 more guns in the next year!
Re: From out of California: California's"one-gun-a-month" law ruled Unconstitutional - DeusxMac - 03-12-2024
hal wrote:
I hate 2A SO MUCH!
Nothing "wrong" with the 2nd Amendment, it's the twisted gun-huggers intentional misinterpretations at fault.
Re: From out of California: California's"one-gun-a-month" law ruled Unconstitutional - pdq - 03-13-2024
Bush appointee. 25 years between law degree and judgeship.
Hopefully not another Benitez.
Let’s wait for the appeal.
Re: From out of California: California's"one-gun-a-month" law ruled Unconstitutional - pdq - 03-13-2024
Michigan man accidentally shot in face with ghost gun sues manufacturer, ex-friend
… A 19-year-old Michigan man who lost his right eye after being shot with a firearm made from a ghost gun kit filed a lawsuit Tuesday against his former best friend who accidentally shot him and the Pennsylvania company that sold his friend the kit.
The lawsuit…alleges that JSD Supply sold two ghost gun kits in April 2021 to Guy Boyd's then-17-year-old friend without verifying the friend's age or whether he could legally possess a pistol.
… The lawsuit alleges that JSD Supply “proudly, publicly, yet falsely advertised that the guns assembled from its kits required no licensing, could be owned completely ‘off-the-books,’ and required ‘absolutely no paperwork.’"
Find the cost of “freedom”…
Re: From out of California: California's"one-gun-a-month" law ruled Unconstitutional - SDGuy - 03-13-2024
pdq wrote:
Michigan man accidentally shot in face with ghost gun sues manufacturer, ex-friend
… A 19-year-old Michigan man who lost his right eye after being shot with a firearm made from a ghost gun kit filed a lawsuit Tuesday against his former best friend who accidentally shot him and the Pennsylvania company that sold his friend the kit.
The lawsuit…alleges that JSD Supply sold two ghost gun kits in April 2021 to Guy Boyd's then-17-year-old friend without verifying the friend's age or whether he could legally possess a pistol.
… The lawsuit alleges that JSD Supply “proudly, publicly, yet falsely advertised that the guns assembled from its kits required no licensing, could be owned completely ‘off-the-books,’ and required ‘absolutely no paperwork.’"
Find the cost of “freedom”…
And how is this relevant to the topic of this thread?
Re: From out of California: California's"one-gun-a-month" law ruled Unconstitutional - DeusxMac - 03-13-2024
SDGuy wrote:
[quote=pdq]
Michigan man accidentally shot in face with ghost gun sues manufacturer, ex-friend
… A 19-year-old Michigan man who lost his right eye after being shot with a firearm made from a ghost gun kit filed a lawsuit Tuesday against his former best friend who accidentally shot him and the Pennsylvania company that sold his friend the kit.
The lawsuit…alleges that JSD Supply sold two ghost gun kits in April 2021 to Guy Boyd's then-17-year-old friend without verifying the friend's age or whether he could legally possess a pistol.
… The lawsuit alleges that JSD Supply “proudly, publicly, yet falsely advertised that the guns assembled from its kits required no licensing, could be owned completely ‘off-the-books,’ and required ‘absolutely no paperwork.’"
Find the cost of “freedom”…
And how is this relevant to the topic of this thread?
Re: From out of California: California's"one-gun-a-month" law ruled Unconstitutional - Speedy - 03-13-2024
Duh.