MacResource
Washington Post sticks by RIAA story despite evidence it goofed - Printable Version

+- MacResource (https://forums.macresource.com)
+-- Forum: My Category (https://forums.macresource.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Tips and Deals (https://forums.macresource.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=3)
+--- Thread: Washington Post sticks by RIAA story despite evidence it goofed (/showthread.php?tid=46576)



Washington Post sticks by RIAA story despite evidence it goofed - M A V I C - 01-03-2008

http://www.news.com/8301-10784_3-9839170-7.html

A sentence on page 15 of the brief clearly spells out the RIAA's position: "Once (Howell) converted plaintiff's recording into the compressed MP3 format and they are in his shared folder, they are no longer the authorized copies distributed by Plaintiff."

The key words there are "shared folder" and it's an important distinction. It means that before the RIAA considers someone a criminal, a person has to at least appear to be distributing music.



Re: Washington Post sticks by RIAA story despite evidence it goofed - deckeda - 01-03-2008

Just having it in the Shared folder=distribution?


Re: Washington Post sticks by RIAA story despite evidence it goofed - M A V I C - 01-03-2008

That hasn't been clarified, as far as I've seen.


Re: Washington Post sticks by RIAA story despite evidence it goofed - silvarios - 01-04-2008

[quote deckeda]Just having it in the Shared folder=distribution?
I believe it was in his shared Kazaa folder. So pretty much yes.


Nathan