+- MacResource (https://forums.macresource.com)
+-- Forum: My Category (https://forums.macresource.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: 'Friendly' Political Ranting (https://forums.macresource.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=6)
+--- Thread: Dirty Bomb or bridge/tunnel destruction--What's first?!?! Discuss... (/showthread.php?tid=66759)
Dirty Bomb or bridge/tunnel destruction--What's first?!?! Discuss... - Anonymous User - 11-22-2008
I hope a bridge/tunnel. The golden gate would be appropriate seeing that NYC has had it's fill.
A dirty bomb in the windy city would be real bad news!
We know BHO will be tested, our brain damaged VP elect --Joe B told us so, It's jut a matter of where and when...
Not?
Discuss amongst yourselves.
Tron//
Re: Dirty Bomb or bridge/tunnel destruction--What's first?!?! Discuss... - mikeylikesit - 11-22-2008
Why would anyone care to discuss a slur dropped onto the forum by a troll?:bomb:
Re: Dirty Bomb or bridge/tunnel destruction--What's first?!?! Discuss... - davester - 11-22-2008
Tron// wrote:
Discuss amongst yourselves.
Why should we? We don't work for you. Tell you what...you come up with some reasonable discussion points (not the rubbish you just posted) and perhaps we'll discuss it with you.
Re: Dirty Bomb or bridge/tunnel destruction--What's first?!?! Discuss... - mikeylikesit - 11-22-2008
You stalking me Dave?
ecret:
Re: Dirty Bomb or bridge/tunnel destruction--What's first?!?! Discuss... - Lux Interior - 11-22-2008
So you are hoping for a terrorist attack?
Asshole.
Re: Dirty Bomb or bridge/tunnel destruction--What's first?!?! Discuss... - Doc - 11-22-2008
I vote to remove this thread.
Re: Dirty Bomb or bridge/tunnel destruction--What's first?!?! Discuss... - lafinfil - 11-22-2008
It really makes me a bit sad to see this type of post here.
This side of the board has been able to remain relatively sane compared to the all out name calling,
trolling, personal attacks, and other BS that we have seen at various other unnamed forums.
It certainly has not been perfect, and we have had a few good go arounds, but the posters here have for
the most part tried to remain civil and argue their points.
This type of post is just a stink bomb.
I will attribute it to the late hour posting, but who knows for sure.
If the OP really feels this way then I guess it is informative for the rest of us to be aware of these attitudes,
but perhaps it was posted in the heat of the moment - again, who can really tell.
There is a policy in place that allows a moderator to remove a post at the request of an original poster
and many have made that request when cooler heads prevailed.
Thanks to the rest for not feeding on this type of post.
Re: Dirty Bomb or bridge/tunnel destruction--What's first?!?! Discuss... - cbelt3 - 11-22-2008
Both would be tactically difficult, but based on the remote sniffing programs, it would be more difficult to move that much radioactive material around.
OTOH, it would be child's play to get enough LPG into a tunnel to do a FAE-type explosion. Bridges could be attacked with a truckload of thermite, also with relative ease.
Re: Dirty Bomb or bridge/tunnel destruction--What's first?!?! Discuss... - NeverMind - 11-22-2008
I hate threads that end with "DISCUSS"...
Re: Dirty Bomb or bridge/tunnel destruction--What's first?!?! Discuss... - $tevie - 11-22-2008
Take the quotes away from around "Friendly" Political Ranting. Quotes indicate that you are being sarcastic or else euphemistic, in other words the quotes imply that in fact this is not the place to be Friendly.