Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Bottom Up Bailout
#1
I keep hearing Sec. Paulson testify talking about saving the system. Really? Why?
This is the perfect opportunity to tear down the old system and replace it with one that actually works.
Example: We have over 4,000 pages of Federal Tax Codes. Why? Special Interests. What the hell is an oil depreciation allowance anyway? The point is - we need to reboot everything. Will it be painful. Yes. Very. But we are looking at an 11 Trillion Dollar debt for this country. That will kill us and our way of life more surely than another terrorist attack on this country. So what to do?

I call it the 20/20 Solution.
It starts at the bottom, not the top.

The root problem seems to be the Housing market. Okay, so how do we do that? Let the Fed buy up bad loans and foreclosures. Then sell them at twenty cents on the dollar of the current Value.

I live in Southern California, so let me use that as an example. Say you have an empty house valued at $ 500,000. Sale price would be $ 100,000. And who would benefit from this program? FIRST TIME BUYERS with a proven income of $40,000 who can make a down payment of 5% cash. Interest rate would be 6% for a 15 year fix mortgage. That would make a monthly Mortgage payment of around $850 per month.

So the program makes money via interest on Federal Loans. And how does the taxpayer get back the $ 700 Billion?

When the Home Buyer sells his property, assuming that the economy does indeed turn around, he returns to the Government $ .20 on the Dollar of his NET PROFITS.

What would happen? Empty homes would be filled. Neighborhoods would be made whole and have people caring for their homes/investments. Local taxes would be paid. And money would flow back into the economy via people caring for their homes. Building materials for upgrades. Appliance sales. Decorating items.

The focus of the taxpayer Bailout would be the Taxpayers, not Wall Street. The help of this program starts at the bottom, with people who consider their house their home, not an investment tool, for that is indeed the basis of the problem here. This is not about the financial instruments and deals.

No reverse auctions. No balloon payments. No reverse mortgages. No short selling. It is a straight, clean deal between the home buyer and me, the taxpayer. And, since it is a Federal program, just like the IRS, the investor (me, the taxpayer) will always get their money back.

If the Government wants to use my money to revive the economy, OK. But this time it's for regular people. Not investors. Not speculators. Not people looking to flip. Regular people who have always wanted a house, but could never afford one.

The Focus is not the losers who caused the problem, but the people willing to make the investment of money and time to secure the country's future. That, John McCain is what "Country First" should be about. The Wall Street Mafia should figure out how to survive on their own. Adapt or Die. Hey, why have they been paying outrageous salaries to all those Business Geniuses all these years? It's time for them to do what old time actor John Houseman told us in TV ads, "They earn it!"

And that's the 20/20 Solution.















As usual, the government seeks to solve a crisis by starting at the top.
How about starting at the Bottom?
Reply
#2
i'm not sure you have a basic understanding of the problems on wall st. at this point.
Reply
#3
One of the best comments I have heard today was that basically anyone who is bailed out should
now be considered a government employee and draw a government level salary - not the millions they will
probably still get. Lets remove the greed incentive for failure


(sorry I can't remember which commentator said it)
Reply
#4
There are two reasons why your plan will fail.

1. There's not enough wiggle room for fraud. How can we expect the powers to be agree on something that won't line their already bulging pockets? And when I say powers to be, I mean the people who have our political system in their back pockets.

2. It makes too much sense. We can't have a program that most people understand. Any plan proposed must be incoherent and full of fine print to allow for the above mentioned fraud.

I've been expecting some kind of meltdown for a few years now. I'm afraid we are now going straight down the tubes, bailout or not.

A big thank you to all the greedy crooks who put us in the spot we're in. You must really love our country to allow this mess to boil over. May you all rot in hell.
Reply
#5
Rick-o wrote:
There are two reasons why your plan will fail.

1. There's not enough wiggle room for fraud. How can we expect the powers to be agree on something that won't line their already bulging pockets? And when I say powers to be, I mean the people who have our political system in their back pockets.

2. It makes too much sense. We can't have a program that most people understand. Any plan proposed must be incoherent and full of fine print to allow for the above mentioned fraud.

Not to mention that first time home buyers are notoriously unaware that the home doesn't just landscape, clean, and repair itself.
Reply
#6
The plan lacks ponies for everyone, and so is doomed to die a swift death on the House floor.

And by ponies, of course, I mean Ferraris.
Reply
#7
lafinfil wrote:
One of the best comments I have heard today was that basically anyone who is bailed out should
now be considered a government employee and draw a government level salary - not the millions they will
probably still get. Lets remove the greed incentive for failure
(sorry I can't remember which commentator said it)

So if they are considered government employees, do they get government style health care as well?
Reply
#8
Yes, government style health care that government employees get - NOT the benefits bestowed on Congress and above.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)