12-22-2008, 02:02 AM
kj wrote:
[quote=Dakota]
[quote=kj]
I like Swampy's idea since it's always bothered me it's cheaper to buy new things than fix the old. I feel like repair work is more fulfilling than sales anyway. kj.
I am not sure this is something that should bother you, at least for the following reasons. One of the signatures of 3rd world economies is that it is always far cheaper to repair things than to replace them. The reason is that human labor is cheap and production not nearly enough. This breeds poverty. Here, it is the opposite. Labor is not cheap and we have an abundance of production. I am not sure what the right balance is but the market place should find us an equilibrium.
That's interesting. I tend to focus on the wage disparity between us and China (for example) as being the reason we can afford to buy piles of disposable stuff. I don't know if that's a great way to be prosperous, because eventually we're going to run out of cheap labor to exploit. I'm also fond of the idea of buying really nice things, maintaining and keeping them for a long time, but I suppose it's just my preference, rather than a rational thing. kj.
Exactly. Our "prosperity" largely comes from the expliotation of third world labor (often children and sometimes even political prisoners.)
It is only sustainable as long as that disparity can be maintained.