Seven WONDERS of the World?!....1st pic of new 'Wonder WOMAN' tweeted....

[Onamuji]

wave rider wrote:
[quote=wowzer]
[quote=RAMd®d]
I think the bias against large breasted superheroines is deplorable.

Forcing them to undergo a reduction when moving from comics and video games to film, is just- wrong!

To be accurate, wouldn't she have to be flat on the right side? The amazons of history removed their breast, so their strength on the right is undiluted (IIRC).
To make their archery more accurate as I remember...
Mistranslation of the word. The legend didn't originate in Greece, and the name sounds like "without breast" in Greek.

[RAMd®d]

The amazons of history removed their breast, so their strength on the right is undiluted

No, it was allegedly to maintain accuracy and avoid tit-lash and nipple-tweak from the bowstring. You think a string slap on the inside of the forearm stings...


To make their archery more accurate as I remember...

Yes, but Wonder Woman is *that* good, that she can remain symmetrical.


Mine's better.

I'm sure they are.


to a screeching halter.

Ooooh, Wonder Woman in a screaming eagle halter crop top!

[spoiler=On a related occupational hazard note (NRFW)]

[/spoiler]

[wave rider]

RAMd®d wrote:
To make their archery more accurate as I remember...

Yes, but Wonder Woman is *that* good, that she can remain symmetrical.

Was commenting on the Amazons. WW is quite skilled, never seen her use bow and arrow. New WW seems to be wielding a sword, never seen that either.

=wr=

[NewtonMP2100]

......so it is now just a Tale of Two....*itties....????

[davester]

steve... wrote:
[quote=davester]
Are you kidding me? That photo just doesn't cut it. It has none of the "features" that are required of a Wonder Woman photo.

I think cleavage would be one of those features, if I'm not mistaken.
Well, if you want to get technical, the cleavage is located between the features.

Also, this thread is useless without pictures, so...

[Speedy]

Carter will be hard to top, er, beat, uh, succeed.