Great GQ cover

[Paul F.]

hal wrote:
[quote=artie67]
Look for extra arms and hands. Lower right corner for example.

It's plainly obvious to anyone looking at something other than Silverman's boobs.
Yes... but why would we do that? The view is so pleasant and calming...

[RAMd®d]

Huh. Finally, two things for me to like, about Sarah Silverman.

Actually, I think I did see her on a TV show recently, and thought, 'oh my'!

[TheCaber]

I counted 6 extra limbs in that cover photo. Did I miss any?

[btfc]

"GQ mocks Vanity Fair's Photoshop job with new cover"


https://www.yahoo.com/gma/gq-mocks-vanit...ities.html

[Speedy]

hal wrote:
[quote=artie67]
Look for extra arms and hands. Lower right corner for example.

It's plainly obvious to anyone looking at something other than Silverman's boobs.
Why would anyone do that...

[Yoyodyne ArtWorks]

This thread should reassure today's #timesup proponents that the days of treating women as sex objects are officially over...done and done!

[tuqqer]

Acer wrote:
Looks 'shopped to me, but I'm no expert.

Voted funniest MR post in 2018 so far.

[Racer X]

Acer wrote:
Looks 'shopped to me, but I'm no expert.

It's painfully obvious, if you look at the shape of Kate's cheekbones. Duh!

[RAMd®d]

This thread should reassure today's #timesup proponents that the days of treating women as sex objects...

And I thank Ms. Silverman for the inspiration and opportunity to do so.