02-26-2007, 05:32 PM
I ordered the Brother MFC-8860DN recommended by Silencio a few days ago in an earlier thread, and got it for $420 vs. $780 for comparably featured Canon. According to company provided statistics, the Brother is also about half the price long-term for consumables; approx $800 per 25,000 pages for the Canon, and roughly $400 per 25K pages for the Brother using high volume toner carts, another $100, or so, if using regular volume carts. Anyhow, the Brother unit comes w/ 32MB RAM, and one empty RAM slot, which will take up to an add'l 512MB of PC133 SODIMM RAM, to "increase performance" in all areas that rely on RAM based operations..., so, haw much RAM is enough?
I have three 128MB sticks laying around, so adding a 128MB stick is a zero cost option. I used for clients, or gave away a few 256's, and have a half dozen 512's, all currently in use in our laptops. If I still had a 256 laying around, I'd either use it, or swap it for a 512 out of a laptop, but swapping a 128 for a 512 seems too draconian. The pdf I downloaded from Brother talks about "increased performance", but doesn't give any stats, so what I'm asking here, is does anyone know the real world point of diminishing returns in adding RAM to one of these Brother MFC's?
If I just use a 128 for now (after it gets here), I suspect I'll be getting rid of one or two laptops by early summer, and reclaim a 512 at that time, which is what I'm inclined to do, unless someone can show me that adding 256 or 512 will give soooo much more performance that it justifies looking for a more-memory solution sooner. I'm really most concerned about the RAM as to scanning performance, the other functions are less critical. Thanks,
Buzz
==
I have three 128MB sticks laying around, so adding a 128MB stick is a zero cost option. I used for clients, or gave away a few 256's, and have a half dozen 512's, all currently in use in our laptops. If I still had a 256 laying around, I'd either use it, or swap it for a 512 out of a laptop, but swapping a 128 for a 512 seems too draconian. The pdf I downloaded from Brother talks about "increased performance", but doesn't give any stats, so what I'm asking here, is does anyone know the real world point of diminishing returns in adding RAM to one of these Brother MFC's?
If I just use a 128 for now (after it gets here), I suspect I'll be getting rid of one or two laptops by early summer, and reclaim a 512 at that time, which is what I'm inclined to do, unless someone can show me that adding 256 or 512 will give soooo much more performance that it justifies looking for a more-memory solution sooner. I'm really most concerned about the RAM as to scanning performance, the other functions are less critical. Thanks,
Buzz
==