harder to cancel subscriptions

[special]

linked removed

[Spock]

Best judiciary money can buy.

[chopper]

I can see this being moved to the other side... but the intent of my post is not political. Just venting that this was not meant to be

https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2025...ns-easier/

Court nullifies “click-to-cancel” rule that required easy methods of cancellation

FTC failed to follow rulemaking process required by US law, judges rule.

Here you go. Again. "the intent of my post is not political"

Feigned ignorance.

[special]

Thank you for your comments, chopper.

[RAMd®d]

I can see this being moved to the other side... but the intent of my post is not political. Just venting that this was not meant to be  .


this was not meant to be

And why might that be?

Seems pretty damn political to me.

If only there was some place you could do political venting, that would allow for detailed discussion of why the FTC's arguments were rejected, and the merits of that rejections.

This side isn't that place.

[hal]

yeah, I put up a reply, then realized what forum it was in and removed it (we can do that now).

[special]

I wish I could delete the whole thread

[RAMd®d]

I wish I could delete the whole thread .


Really?

I believe when the lead puppy deletes their post, the thread dies on the vine.



yeah, I put up a reply, then realized what forum it was in and removed it (we can do that now). .


I saw that, figured what you did, so here's a belated 'Good on ya!'.