ARRESTED development!. . .Sarah Palin's pregnant daughter's BF's mother arrested. . .

[Black Landlord]

kj wrote:
[quote=Black Landlord]
I guess I'd like it if you would try to react to the content and subject matter of the -individual- posts rather than getting stuck on this "defending the poor outnumbered underdog" thing.
I get that, I really do.

Ok, sure. I'll try.

Black Landlord wrote:
But it seems like more and more you're taking the side of people who harrass and lie and willfully misconstrue and most of the time are only looking for a pound of flesh, and have no interest in learning or exploring or getting closer to any sort of truth.

I don't see anyone here who fits your description. At least any more than anyone else. But like I've said, there are a few more conservatives around here, and I'm glad, whether you or anyone else likes their views, tactics, etc. or not. Btw, when's the last time you've taken Wags, Dennis, or any of the other venomous "lefties" to task? Davester's the only one I've seen do it (and I appreciate it, for whatever little it's worth). kj.
You are mischaracterizing me by implying I don't want to see a balance of viewpoints here. And you have absolutely missed some posts of mine in regard to Dennis S and others. You seem to only be seeing what you want to see in your quest to divide this board into 2 sides.
Ironically you seem to be doing a better job of accomlishing this than any of the horrible nasties you've declared war upon.

[kj]

>>>You are mischaracterizing me by implying I don't want to see a balance of viewpoints here.

I didn't really mean exactly that. I guess I don't mind as much having people here who have "unacceptable" views. I can explain more if that doesn't make sense. In no way am I saying you behave as if you want this to be a liberal club. But there are some who I think do.

>>>And you have absolutely missed some posts of mine in regard to Dennis S and others. You seem to only be seeing what you want to see in your quest to divide this board into 2 sides.

That certainly could be, but I think I left some room for me to be wrong. I probably truly missed your posts, but I didn't ignore them.

>>>Ironically you seem to be doing a better job of accomlishing this than any of the horrible nasties you've declared war upon.

I don't think I have to divide the board. If it mirrors reality, it will be roughly divided. But that doesn't mean it has to be nasty, and it doesn't mean we can't have a fair amount of common ground. And if I'm being an ass, I don't mind being called on it. Like I said, I tend that way, and I don't necessarily mean to. Also, like i've said, I like your approach a lot, so I didn't mean to irritate you. kj.