01-20-2010, 02:53 PM
With healthcare, immigration and consumer protection reform likely to be off the congressional agenda for the time being, now would seem to be a good time to revisit the thorny question of copyright reform.
Arthur Conan Doyle, the writer of the Sherlock Holmes stories, died in 1930 some 80 years ago yet his work hasn't passed into the public domain. Holmes first appeared in print in 1887 so the author had plenty of time to profit from his work during his lifetime.
The New York Times has an interesting article on the current position. "There are now nine surviving Conan Doyle heirs, and none is a direct descendant of the author."
So tell me again, how is this promoting the progress of science and useful arts? Wouldn't now be a good time to lobby your congress whore to reform copyright.
Arthur Conan Doyle, the writer of the Sherlock Holmes stories, died in 1930 some 80 years ago yet his work hasn't passed into the public domain. Holmes first appeared in print in 1887 so the author had plenty of time to profit from his work during his lifetime.
The New York Times has an interesting article on the current position. "There are now nine surviving Conan Doyle heirs, and none is a direct descendant of the author."
So tell me again, how is this promoting the progress of science and useful arts? Wouldn't now be a good time to lobby your congress whore to reform copyright.