Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Okay, which one of you has been spending your money on iPads instead of medicine?
#1
Because Rick Santorum thinks that buying an iPad is just like spending a million dollars a year on medication for you schizophrenic child.

http://news.yahoo.com/rick-santorum-tell...-news.html

There are many people sick today who, 10 years from now, are going to be alive because of some drug invented in the next 10 years. If we say: 'You drug companies are greedy and bad, you can't make a return on your money,' then we will freeze innovation.

Because the only other option is to forbid drug companies from making a profit. If sick people can't pay then they can play with their iPad instead.

What Would Pfizer Do?
Reply
#2
The ardent free market proponents have to treat health and wellness like other exchangeable commodities--like an iPad. But they aren't: both of them are logically prior to market behavior (since you can't otherwise participate in a free market). It's one reason why public health is a shared responsibility, especially in a capitalist system: you have to make it possible for people to participate. Santorum's response reveals an out-of-touch understanding of the problem: the woman wasn't complaining that she couldn't buy an iPad because of the need to buy medication, but that a mandatory expense threatened all market participation. He should be more compassionate, and a better capitalist.
Reply
#3
J Marston wrote:
The ardent free market proponents have to treat health and wellness like other exchangeable commodities--like an iPad. But they aren't: both of them are logically prior to market behavior (since you can't otherwise participate in a free market). It's one reason why public health is a shared responsibility, especially in a capitalist system: you have to make it possible for people to participate. Santorum's response reveals an out-of-touch understanding of the problem: the woman wasn't complaining that she couldn't buy an iPad because of the need to buy medication, but that a mandatory expense threatened all market participation. He should be more compassionate, and a better capitalist.

Well said.
Reply
#4
He's a turd.
Reply
#5
Santorum is a worthless POS.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)