"White House email contradicts Benghazi leaks"

[$tevie]

CNN's Jake Tapper reports:

CNN has obtained an e-mail sent by a top aide to President Barack Obama about White House reaction to the deadly attack last September 11 on the U.S. diplomatic compound in Benghazi, Libya, that apparently differs from how sources characterized it to two different media organizations.

The actual e-mail from then-Deputy National Security Adviser for Strategic Communications Ben Rhodes appears to show that whomever leaked it did so in a way that made it appear that the White House was primarily concerned with the State Department's desire to remove references and warnings about specific terrorist groups so as to not bring criticism to the department.

http://thelead.blogs.cnn.com/2013/05/14/...azi-leaks/

[beagledave]

$tevie wrote:
CNN's Jake Tapper reports:

CNN has obtained an e-mail sent by a top aide to President Barack Obama about White House reaction to the deadly attack last September 11 on the U.S. diplomatic compound in Benghazi, Libya, that apparently differs from how sources characterized it to two different media organizations.

The actual e-mail from then-Deputy National Security Adviser for Strategic Communications Ben Rhodes appears to show that whomever leaked it did so in a way that made it appear that the White House was primarily concerned with the State Department's desire to remove references and warnings about specific terrorist groups so as to not bring criticism to the department.

http://thelead.blogs.cnn.com/2013/05/14/...azi-leaks/

Remember, as Swampy has pointed out...this ain't about politics.

[max]

beagledave wrote:
Remember, as Swampy has pointed out...this ain't about politics.

True dat, but she is a conservative,
she does not speak for the left wingnutosphere of this board.

So it looks like you can continue without a hindrance....

[Wild eep]

max wrote:
[quote=beagledave]
Remember, as Swampy has pointed out...this ain't about politics.

True dat, but she is a conservative,
she does not speak for the left wingnutosphere of this board.

So it looks like you can continue without a hindrance....
Why is it then that the righties here are usually the foaming at the mouth batshit crazy ones?

[max]

Wild eep wrote:
[quote=max]
[quote=beagledave]
Remember, as Swampy has pointed out...this ain't about politics.

True dat, but she is a conservative,
she does not speak for the left wingnutosphere of this board.

So it looks like you can continue without a hindrance....
Why is it then that the righties here are usually the foaming at the mouth batshit crazy ones?
In the nuthouse even a colorful flower will be seen as oddity by its fruits....

[RgrF]

$tevie wrote:
CNN's Jake Tapper reports:

CNN has obtained an e-mail sent by a top aide to President Barack Obama about White House reaction to the deadly attack last September 11 on the U.S. diplomatic compound in Benghazi, Libya, that apparently differs from how sources characterized it to two different media organizations.

The actual e-mail from then-Deputy National Security Adviser for Strategic Communications Ben Rhodes appears to show that whomever leaked it did so in a way that made it appear that the White House was primarily concerned with the State Department's desire to remove references and warnings about specific terrorist groups so as to not bring criticism to the department.

http://thelead.blogs.cnn.com/2013/05/14/...azi-leaks/

A White House email, wonder how CNN stumbled across that one.

[Ted King]

Benghazi primarily a CIA messup? :

http://www.motherjones.com/kevin-drum/20...i-turf-war

[max]

RgrF wrote:
A White House email, wonder how CNN stumbled across that one.

Good question...

Ted King wrote:
Benghazi primarily a CIA messup? :

An unlikely answer, but, hey,
it is just another one, in the continuos chain of exactly the same spin coming from this administration....

[decay]

[swampy]

Charlene Lamb testified under oath that the funding cuts did not affect Benghazi security. But that was a good try, decay. Almost as good as some Dems trying to blame Benghazi on the Republicans opposing the sequester.