"Trump: Clinton will only win Pennsylvania if 'they cheat'"

[samintx]

RgrF wrote:
He's going to get blown out by such large margins that any accusation of rigging will become just another joke du jour.

But his minions can revolt and become physical over him losing "legally" but they will claim "fraud" as he has told them.

[Speedy]

samintx wrote:
I am afraid the Trump minions will take the law into their own hands when he loses Penna. And what is the law about Election Judges and Poll sitters? can the Trumpster put his own crowd sitting watching the polls for "fraud". It could get ugly when he doesn't win. Donald has given them a license to revolt.miley-rpg028:miley-gen081:

His supporters need only show up at the polls with big guns. If there are enough of them and they point those guns at non-Trump voters, it will have an effect.

[bfd]

Dumbf needs to be worried about the Beatrice conspiracy as well…

[pdq]

Speedy wrote:
Democrats in Pennsylvania cheated last time and they'll do it again.

http://www.philly.com/philly/news/politi...votes.html

"It's one thing for a Democratic presidential candidate to dominate a Democratic city like Philadelphia, but check out this head-spinning figure: In 59 voting divisions in the city, Mitt Romney received not one vote. Zero. Zilch."
---

"where unofficial vote tallies have President Obama outscoring Romney by a combined 19,605 to 0?"
---

""I'd be surprised if there weren't a handful of precincts that didn't cast a vote for Romney," he said. But the number of zero precincts in Philadelphia deserves examination, Sabato added.

"Not a single vote for Romney or even an error? That's worth looking into," he said."

As pointed out before, there were plenty of districts in 2012 where Obama got zero votes, and everyone voted for the loser, Romney.

Was that a priori fraud?

[Speedy]

pdq wrote:
[quote=Speedy]
Democrats in Pennsylvania cheated last time and they'll do it again.

http://www.philly.com/philly/news/politi...votes.html

"It's one thing for a Democratic presidential candidate to dominate a Democratic city like Philadelphia, but check out this head-spinning figure: In 59 voting divisions in the city, Mitt Romney received not one vote. Zero. Zilch."
---

"where unofficial vote tallies have President Obama outscoring Romney by a combined 19,605 to 0?"
---

""I'd be surprised if there weren't a handful of precincts that didn't cast a vote for Romney," he said. But the number of zero precincts in Philadelphia deserves examination, Sabato added.

"Not a single vote for Romney or even an error? That's worth looking into," he said."

As pointed out before, there were plenty of districts in 2012 where Obama got zero votes, and everyone voted for the loser, Romney.

Was that a priori fraud?
Awfully small precincts.

[$tevie]

Everyone knows that Black men have bigger precincts.

[pdq]

Is it really hard to believe that in predominantly African American precincts, the GOP candidate will get no votes?

NBC wrote:

Zero.

That's the percentage of African-American voters who picked Donald Trump over Hillary Clinton in the battleground states of Ohio and Pennsylvania, according to the latest NBC News/Wall Street Journal/Marist polls.

In Ohio, where the two candidates are tied, 11 percent of the 848 registered voters in the poll were African American, and they broke for Clinton, 88 percent to 0 percent.

And in Pennsylvania, where Clinton was ahead by nine points, 10 percent of the 829 voters are African American, and they went for Clinton, 91 percent to 0 percent.

These folks aren't dumb. Nor do they quickly forget.

(...or are the pre-election polls subject to fraud too? That dastardly Wall Street Journal...)