still early, but I think the tweet of the day comes from HRC

[deckeda]

https://twitter.com/HillaryClinton/statu...7178186752&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.washingtonpost.com%2Fpolitics%2Fhillary-clinton-seated-at-a-mock-resolute-desk-reads-her-once-controversial-emails-at-a-venice-art-exhibit%2F2019%2F09%2F12%2F2dd2b91a-d561-11e9-9343-40db57cf6abd_story.html

spoiler alert: there be hate comments there

"In an interview with Italian news outlet TGR Veneto outside the exhibit, Clinton called the controversy over her email “one of the strangest, most absurd events in American political history.”

https://beta.washingtonpost.com/politics...story.html

[pdq]

:agree:

It’s telling, I think, that after 10 runs at BENGHAZI, BENGHAZI, BENGHAZI! didn’t do the trick, they had to scrape the bottom of the barrel for that one.

[mattkime]

pdq wrote:
:agree:

It’s telling, I think, that after 10 runs at BENGHAZI, BENGHAZI, BENGHAZI! didn’t do the trick, they had to scrape the bottom of the barrel for that one.

Yes...and at the same time its a bit naive on her part. This happens all the time. Don't trust the person and then dig dig dig to justify it....

[sekker]

I heard some otherwise rational people cite 'her emails' as a reason to not vote Dem in 2016.

Was a really interesting psychological tactic to capture anti-women votes.