06-26-2024, 04:26 PM
These of course are pissing contests with little relationship to usability, but it looks like Snapdragon is starting to (partially) catch up…to last year’s M3 (and almost - not quite, but almost - to the M2)

In multicore?
Like I said, pissing contest, and this is just one benchmarking test suite, but it’s notable that…
Apple’s lead may not last forever, but I think it’s remarkable how well Apple has done in so little time without even being a traditional “chip company”.

In multicore?
When it comes to PassMark's multi-thread benchmark, Qualcomm's 12-core Snapdragon X Elite X1E-84-100 processor scores 23,272 points, which is ahead of Apple's 9-core M4 (22,445 points, inside a tablet and without active cooling) and Intel's Core i5-12600H (22,748 points, 12C/16T, 2.70 GHz to 4.50 GHz, 35W to 95W). However, the system-on-chip is significantly behind Apple's 14-core M3 Max (36,346), 12-core M3 Pro (27,318), and even 12-core M2 Pro (26,406).
Like I said, pissing contest, and this is just one benchmarking test suite, but it’s notable that…
Another point to consider is that Qualcomm has never advertised thermal envelope or power consumption for its Snapdragon X Elite processors. When comparing them to desktop or laptop x86 CPUs, we may be comparing Apples and Bananas to Oranges.
Yet, the power consumption of Snapdragon X Elite X1E-84-100 should be comparable with some of Apple's latest processors (say, 12-core M3 Max) and if this is the case, then Qualcomm's SoC just cannot beat its direct competitor in traditional workloads.
Apple’s lead may not last forever, but I think it’s remarkable how well Apple has done in so little time without even being a traditional “chip company”.