Posts: 4,749
Threads: 449
Joined: Dec 2015
Reputation:
0
Sorry Michael. If you are going to go around the country making references to the founding fathers - and make a whole bunch of money and political capital in the process - you better damn well be able to engage in a meaningful conversation about the topic.
Posts: 2,206
Threads: 73
Joined: Sep 2010
Reputation:
0
She should know - she's the one who's supposed to be the politician who would like to hold a higher office in this country. It's her "job" to have feelings about these sorts of things. You or I, not so much. I think she said Washington because it was the only name that she could dredge up in that pea brain of her's.
She is a dim bulb - I lost a few IQ points just watching her. Beck even seemed stunned by her dumbness.
Posts: 4,019
Threads: 29
Joined: Feb 2024
Reputation:
0
Mick, you are following her much more closely then I am. I am not sure this is meaningful conversation though. Maybe if she was asked to discussed or explain the founding father's differing views on state's rights vs. federalism (that would be meaningful).
In any case, I will stop defending her (I usually only see SP when I watch the daily show on hulu, and am disappointed that he hasn't picked up a clip yet this week; but I bet that is coming).
Posts: 15,842
Threads: 95
Joined: May 2025
Mike Sellers wrote:
[quote=michaelb]Maybe if she was asked to discussed or explain the founding father's differing views on state's rights vs. federalism (that would be meaningful).
I'd pay good money to see someone ask her that. Well, I'd pay to see her try to answer. :biggrin:
I might pay to
not see her attempt to answer. :eye: