01-15-2010, 05:50 PM
i'm having trouble remembering whether to defend or attack the banks. we need a schedule
Punishment for paying off TARP loans with interest
|
01-15-2010, 05:50 PM
i'm having trouble remembering whether to defend or attack the banks. we need a schedule
01-15-2010, 06:00 PM
Barney Frank Says Multi-Million Dollar Bonuses for Government-Owned Freddie, Fannie ‘Too High’--But Nothing Can Be Done About It
http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/59848 Nothing can be done about it?
01-15-2010, 06:13 PM
swampy wrote: My comments are based on your selected quotes. And yes, I question the source. As I said, FNN is clearly not in the business of reporting facts. When it comes to financial news, something that may directly affect me when I make investment decisions based on it, I am not going to trust Fox. Fox has defended their right to lie and it would be especially unwise to follow their business news). They are also very bad at math: http://rawstory.com/2010/01/fox-news-inf...actor-100/
01-15-2010, 08:45 PM
mattkime wrote: Since I'm hot for cliches today, how about "What's good for Chase is good for America."
01-15-2010, 10:38 PM
Anybody who believes any of this "banks paid back the TARP funds with interest" nonsense deserves to continue getting fleeced by these crooks.
There's fraud, there's corruption, and then there's what the Big Six banks did to us under cover of "saving the financial system" in the autumn of 2008. That's something we probably need a new word for. There's a whole litany of malfeasance I could probably itemize here, but the most succinct phrase that illustrates why I don't trust anything they say is this: "mark-to-model" accounting.
01-17-2010, 03:36 PM
mattkime wrote: Bingo.
01-18-2010, 12:43 AM
$tevie wrote: Bingo. Why do you need someone to tell YOU how to feel about things? What is this, Soviet Russia? |
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|