04-08-2013, 02:19 PM
Obviously there will be people here who are more knowledgeable about the events than myself but to answer Will Collier's "Ludicrous" I will say a few things.
At the end of of her premiership the people of the UK were actually paying a higher percentage of their income in taxes than at the beginning and this was after 12 years so you couldn't blame the previous government.
During those years there were two recessions caused by the Tory government's deliberate policies.
We had the return to mass unemployment not seen since the 1930s.
Their financial deregulation laid the basis for the credit bubble of 2000s and subsequent credit crisis.
To help the balance of payments most of the publicly owned industries were sold off in the belief that in private hands they would be run more efficiently. That didn't work and our transport system is still poor and fares, especially on the trains, is ludicrously high. (As an aside that was actually good for me back then as for a while I was a Private Hire Driver and it was very much cheaper for businesses to get me in London to go and pick up a couple of managers from their homes and drive them to the doors of their businesses they were visiting in Newcastle or Manchester two to three hundred miles away than for them to use the train).
One of her election victories was from public support after the Argentinians invaded the Falklands. What wasn't so obvious at the time was that the Argentinians felt they could do that because the Tory government under Thatcher had tried to save money and vastly reduced our military presence on the islands despite the islanders pleading with them not to because they feared that would allow the Argentinians in...and it did.
Our steel industry was annihilated as was our coal industry. I'm not saying it was by any means perfect before but a huge percentage of our manufacturing base was destroyed, hundreds of towns and even cities had the heart ripped out of them all in the name of free markets.
One of the first decisions taken was to reduce the top rate of income tax so the top earners immediately had the equivalent of a huge pay rise whereas by the end there were many more people in poverty but that's all right, the top earners were OK.
Yes, if you think of the UK as a business, she might have been instrumental in helping its economics but it was done in the way asset strippers did with companies, big profits for those who already have the most at a huge human cost.
I will stop for now.
Paul
At the end of of her premiership the people of the UK were actually paying a higher percentage of their income in taxes than at the beginning and this was after 12 years so you couldn't blame the previous government.
During those years there were two recessions caused by the Tory government's deliberate policies.
We had the return to mass unemployment not seen since the 1930s.
Their financial deregulation laid the basis for the credit bubble of 2000s and subsequent credit crisis.
To help the balance of payments most of the publicly owned industries were sold off in the belief that in private hands they would be run more efficiently. That didn't work and our transport system is still poor and fares, especially on the trains, is ludicrously high. (As an aside that was actually good for me back then as for a while I was a Private Hire Driver and it was very much cheaper for businesses to get me in London to go and pick up a couple of managers from their homes and drive them to the doors of their businesses they were visiting in Newcastle or Manchester two to three hundred miles away than for them to use the train).
One of her election victories was from public support after the Argentinians invaded the Falklands. What wasn't so obvious at the time was that the Argentinians felt they could do that because the Tory government under Thatcher had tried to save money and vastly reduced our military presence on the islands despite the islanders pleading with them not to because they feared that would allow the Argentinians in...and it did.
Our steel industry was annihilated as was our coal industry. I'm not saying it was by any means perfect before but a huge percentage of our manufacturing base was destroyed, hundreds of towns and even cities had the heart ripped out of them all in the name of free markets.
One of the first decisions taken was to reduce the top rate of income tax so the top earners immediately had the equivalent of a huge pay rise whereas by the end there were many more people in poverty but that's all right, the top earners were OK.
Yes, if you think of the UK as a business, she might have been instrumental in helping its economics but it was done in the way asset strippers did with companies, big profits for those who already have the most at a huge human cost.
I will stop for now.
Paul