Secret Jewish Space Laser

[p8712]

Guess Who

Now, you might wonder why, if an international cabal of Jewish bankers wanted to finance a rail project, they would go about it by using their space lasers to set a catastrophic blaze. Aren’t there easier ways to get your rail stations approved by the state legislature? If you can pull off a massive conspiracy like that and keep it quiet, and you have a space laser you can use to immolate basically any target on Earth, there have to be more direct profit-making opportunities than burning down trees in order to arbitrage the land value for a public-transit contract.

For those of you keeping score this was a potential disaster from SimCity 2000. Well, except for the Jewish part.

[rgG]

It is just amazing what some people will believe.

[Ombligo]

rgG wrote:
It is just amazing disgustingly sad what some people will believe.

FTFU

[SteveG]

and yet, hardly a whisper of criticism from the big time GOPers.

It's more than her hate-filled constituents, it's the entire Republican establishment supporting this person.

[GGD]

I think there needs to be a congressional investigation into why the Space Force has failed to detect and defend us from this Space Laser.

[btfc]

I don’t see the comparison with AOC as particularly valid.

[Blankity Blank]

btfc wrote:
I don’t see the comparison with AOC as particularly valid.

It took reading through the article comments, and rereading the opening a time or two, but I am 95% of the way there in seeing that he wasn’t making that comparison himself. Chait was, a little too off handedly I’d say, pointing at the Axios article he mentions in the beginning for making that equivalency.

The difference maker is here,
”The leading Democratic mischief-maker is Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, who advocates some left-wing views I consider simplistic and impractical and, in some cases, poll badly. The top example of a conservative mischief-maker, [dripping with sarcasm tag->] presented in perfect symmetry,[/ <- dripping with sarcasm tag] is Marjorie Taylor Greene.”

Add that missing non-existent sarcasm tag, and the WTF goes away.

[RgrF]

The author lives in a world of nuance that causes folks to study his utterances for meaning that they'll never spend time to find.

That's failure to pass Communication 101.

[Blankity Blank]

RgrF wrote:
The author either lives in a world of nuance that causes folks to study his utterances for meaning that they'll never spend time to find.

That's failure to pass Communication 101.

You are not wrong.

[deckeda]

Poor communication is often derived from a false premise. Neither one of them are making “mischief.”