10-21-2009, 03:15 PM
Not original. There are dozens of similar technologies in the works.
I don't think that it's likely to be adopted, except in very rare circumstances. Those treatments that rely on heat inevitably damage surrounding tissues and generate an inflammatory response so there's significant risk involved. There's a good chance that in practice it will be no better than radiation treatments.*
'Meantime, nanoparticles that deliver chemo are the next wave of nanotech in cancer treatment.
Photoreactive nanotech solutions are poised to be the wave after that.
Even if the "radio" therapy works, it's probably going to be outclassed by other tech.
*Not a medical doctor, just very well read... especially on this subject due to a personal interest.
I don't think that it's likely to be adopted, except in very rare circumstances. Those treatments that rely on heat inevitably damage surrounding tissues and generate an inflammatory response so there's significant risk involved. There's a good chance that in practice it will be no better than radiation treatments.*
'Meantime, nanoparticles that deliver chemo are the next wave of nanotech in cancer treatment.
Photoreactive nanotech solutions are poised to be the wave after that.
Even if the "radio" therapy works, it's probably going to be outclassed by other tech.
*Not a medical doctor, just very well read... especially on this subject due to a personal interest.