Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Elgato Turbo.264 vs Handbrake
#13
deckeda wrote:
[quote=guitarist]
However, I've noticed that the Turbo produces an annoyingly high rate of sound-sync errors. I've transferred hundreds of movies and TV shows, many of them in bulk, and find that with the Turbo-processed videos, I've had to go back and redo about dozens of them in Handbrake, because the Turbo didn't accurately sync the picture and sound. The result is unwatchable. Very frustrating. I want ElGato to address this.

AFAIK elgato can't address this, because it's using the Quicktime API to do the hard work behind the scenes.

However, to verify that assertion I just made, do the transcode instead with Quicktime alone, no Turbo used.
if Elgato is using the Quicktime API, why is it so much faster than handbrake?
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Elgato Turbo.264 vs Handbrake - by lazydays - 04-07-2010, 05:52 AM
Re: Elgato Turbo.264 vs Handbrake - by lazydays - 04-07-2010, 05:56 AM
Re: Elgato Turbo.264 vs Handbrake - by Done - 04-07-2010, 06:09 AM
Re: Elgato Turbo.264 vs Handbrake - by IronMac - 04-07-2010, 06:42 AM
Re: Elgato Turbo.264 vs Handbrake - by Dik2 - 04-07-2010, 06:55 AM
Re: Elgato Turbo.264 vs Handbrake - by deckeda - 04-07-2010, 07:42 AM
Re: Elgato Turbo.264 vs Handbrake - by olnacl - 04-07-2010, 10:15 AM
Re: Elgato Turbo.264 vs Handbrake - by guitarist - 04-07-2010, 10:22 AM
Re: Elgato Turbo.264 vs Handbrake - by Rick-o - 04-07-2010, 01:49 PM
Re: Elgato Turbo.264 vs Handbrake - by decay - 04-07-2010, 02:02 PM
Re: Elgato Turbo.264 vs Handbrake - by deckeda - 04-07-2010, 09:57 PM
Re: Elgato Turbo.264 vs Handbrake - by space-time - 04-08-2010, 12:27 AM
Re: Elgato Turbo.264 vs Handbrake - by guitarist - 04-08-2010, 12:21 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)