10-18-2011, 06:50 PM
cbelt3 wrote:
Oh, less slop, to be sure. And the 'well, he's accepted less money !' argument begs the question of 'so, he's just being rented, not bought ? '
So since it's the same in kind the difference in quantity makes no difference worth considering? A politician that get's only 4% of his campaign money from Wall Street is going to be just as beholding to them as a candidate getting a quarter of his money from Wall Street?