02-17-2012, 09:27 PM
What's funny is that YOU didn't read it, because it doesn't make your case at all. I think most of the people who get involved in this type of conversation read and comprehend pretty quickly, so trying to use a lengthy, out of date source that's a partisan rant short on facts, hoping that nobody actually reads it, is pretty lame.
Oh, and the WaPo interview above. You can't refute with facts a single word of that.
So, 13 comments later, you haven't made your case. We get your opinion, which really only took one comment to present. So in the interest of saving you from wasting time here, if you can't back up your opinion with facts, just leave it at that.
Oh, and the WaPo interview above. You can't refute with facts a single word of that.
So, 13 comments later, you haven't made your case. We get your opinion, which really only took one comment to present. So in the interest of saving you from wasting time here, if you can't back up your opinion with facts, just leave it at that.